The US Air Force has made an appeal for a range of new technologies which it will need in building its planned new arsenal of aerial rayguns. In particular, it wants large artificial optically-correct diamonds for use as portholes through which to shoot electropulse microwave blaster cannons. Under its "Directed Energy [Weapon] …
You lot keep promising me freakin' sharks with freakin' lasers on their heads but haven't delivered. Snap to it boys I want one for my... umm.... aquarium, yeah aquarium that's it /cue evil laughter =P.
A "sharks with frikkin' lasorrrrs!" story - you've made my day.......
Maybe they should be reading El Reg
.... and talk to the Boffins at Fraunhofer.
No Phase Plasma rifle in the 40-Watt range?
Also, the "bucket-o-sunshine" description of a nuke made me chuckle, what other phrases are used to describe instant death by nuke?
The military come up with some wonderful phrases to try and sanitize killing, maiming or just blowing shit up. For instance, "Friendly Fire" to describe killing your own side. Anyone got any others?
Back on topic, my guess is that a optically correct diamond, 2.5 inches across would cost a bit to make, if indeed it can currently be made.
Maybe they could talk to they Austrian blokes and see if their basalt-fibre whatsits can do the trick?
"...while similar in usage to carbon fibre and fibreglass, it's tougher than the latter and cheaper than the former. It is also fully recyclable and has a specific tenacity three times that of steel. At least that's what is says here.
The basalt-fibre body panels will apparently be transparent giving the car the appearance of being made of glass..."
Sharks or Jets?
What's with the sharks with lasers obsession?
Just an observation, but sharks scare people, and they tend to move away from them very quickly!! Why not mount the lasers on dolphins instead, they'd have a much better chance of getting close up before blasting bad guys (and girls) right between the eyes! :-D
would that be a laaser?
Paris, because even she knows about PDFs.
I like it..
How many 'D' cells does it take?
@Sharks or Jets AC
Hmm, I spot a disadvantage with the Dolphin plan as well, what they really need is a semi aquatic mammal for land/sea roles here..
How about um...
Beavers with frikkin lasers?
I for one welcome our lazer headed shark-type overlords.... when they arrive, that is.
@ Pad: my favourite so far is "suicide by cop". Always brings a smile!
Maybe they should get Microsoft to supply the diamonds ...
Oooppss Sorry you got Cubit Zirconia's Programming error Bang
business as usual
You'd think that with the massive economic problems currently facing the US, the powers-at-be would call a halt to R&D of such exotic weaponry. As Rep. Ron Paul said this week "...the problem is nobody wants to cut the American Empire, even Obama's Administration wants to increase spending overseas and increase military spending. As long as you want to run the World Empire... you cannot solve this problem."
Transparent Aluminium is just about here courtesy of 3M
Ah, those 3M guys. Is there anything they cant' do?
90Watts/Lb is roughyl 200 Watts/Kg (Translating from the merkin) a large shark is good for tackling man sized prey so capable of wielding a good 100Kg's say half that since the shark has to lug it around all day so, looks like the shark will only put out 10KW.
Probably is enough for the shorter ranges one would expect a shark to operate at.
2.5" dia diamonds?
No, they won't be having any problems keeping *those* in stock.
// Paris, because she'd like one
Maybe the lads at View Askew productions got it wrong and there is a reason for the Platypus after all then?
bucket-o-sunshine side effect
This wins for phrase of the week. Thanks
I can see the coppers getting this right after the military. Stops all those pesky car chases.
Does the warranty on this gear involve a loan shark?
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Interview Global Warming IS REAL, argues sceptic mathematician - it just isn't THERMAGEDDON