This is at the same time... #
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 12:43 GMT
... that the Coroners and Justice Bill is planning on allowing *greater* data sharing between departments "if a Minister says it's needed"?
Shurely shome mishtake!
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 12:24 GMT
"The Home Office has promised that all mobile or portable machines which carry personal data will be encrypted from now on, and that any contractor will also use encryption."
Why should you *ever* have personal data on a portable device ever.
Morons.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 12:43 GMT
... that the Coroners and Justice Bill is planning on allowing *greater* data sharing between departments "if a Minister says it's needed"?
Shurely shome mishtake!
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 12:59 GMT
So it's ok to store personal data on removable/portable media and lose it .. .so long as it's encrypted !?
I would consider putting my personal data on a removable or portable device in the first place the real neglect.
Encryption will not stop data being retrieved by a determined cracker for long - especially as it wouldn't be hard to locate the encryption keys by social, rather than brue force, attacks - given these are government bodies we're talking about.
"We lost 2 keys and 4 laptops this week but we won't report it or be punished for it because they're safely encrypted"
Unforntunately this attitude will ensure more data is lost and we will never even know about it.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 13:01 GMT
if you breach the DPA, you become personally liable, as well as the company. Companies can absorb fees without even noticing, but the staff won't do it again if they have to pay too.
I'm pretty sure the company i work for will hang anyone out to dry if they don't comply with the training given.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 13:19 GMT
I'm just reading that Coroners and Justice bill:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmbills/009/2009009.pdf
Read section 152. The bitch is trying to give herself the power to directly write or modify laws absent of Parliament.
(1) An information-sharing order may—
(a) confer powers on the person in respect of whom it is made;
(b) remove or modify any prohibition or restriction imposed ...
(h) modify any enactment.
Also the power to directly write crimes without Parliaments consent:
"An information-sharing order may provide for the creation of offences
triable either way which are punishable..."
Wow, that's like the enabling act, the exact same trick, exact same game, done the exact same way. She really is not fit to be in any position of power.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 14:23 GMT
With the password attached on a yellow PostIt note.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 16:26 GMT
After numerous violations of the DPA, the ICO is forced to send them a 'naughty boy' notification.
So the inept send a letter to the inept.
Well, that makes me feel safer already.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 19:03 GMT
This pronouncement is just blowing smoke. What's probably happening is the institution of seriously draconian rules against whistle blowing or revealing that a loss has taken place.
You can only lie and mislead and distort for so long before everyone waves off everything you say as just another pack of lies.
Posted Friday 23rd January 2009 22:36 GMT
Next headline from HMG's HO:
Home Office now realize that it is the 21st Century