If 43 is young then I must be fucking embryonic.
Judges have granted a review of the Home Secretary's decision to continue with extradition proceedings against Pentagon hacker Gary McKinnon. The decision - by Lord Justice Maurice Key and Mr Justice Simon - places a judicial block on attempts to haul McKinnon over to the US on hacking offences, irrespective of whether UK …
If 43 is young then I must be fucking embryonic.
UK - "aw bless, it's ok little Johnny, here have free everything. Anything else you need?"
US - "now look here you piece of shit criminal, you're a piece of shit and I'm going to treat you like a piece of shit."
Although with Obama it's soon to be the same bullshit in the US.
"Justice for none and freedom for all" should've been his slogan ...
"recent diagnosis with Asperger's syndrome"
Is this an attempt at an Ernest Saunders defence?
McKinnon admitted (allegedly) to breaking into US Mil and Nasa sites by going in through an open door, rooted around looking for ufo stuff and apparently did loads of damage (like telling them that their security was shite) and brought down 300 computers.
I think that since there is now a new guy in charge at the top who believes in openness for the good of the people and not to cover the hairy arses of some incompetant sysadmins, and publicity seeking DA's.
McKinnons lawyers should be asking for the whole truth as to how he managed this feat.
If McKinnon has got aspergers then he will be eaten alive by the american judicial system.
they are the archtypal weird kid, there is just something about them read this guys first comment http://www.guardian.co.uk/users/darrenforster99/comments
he most certainly has it.
If Barack allows this to go ahead the all that talk of inclusivaty, non-discrimination etc. will be shown up as just another load of tosh by some party politician.
In my misspent youth we were into loads of systems, mainly to see if it could be done (it could) we never caused any damage (covered by criminal damage laws) and never stole any propriety information (covered by other existing legislation).
Emma Nicholson (anybody remember her...no I thought not) brought in some hysterical ott anti-hacking laws (my god she has been reincarnated as waki jaki) and put an end to our exploits. But there again I don't have aspergers and could read between the lines.
Which they had to do before the one-sided extradition treaty was signed by the UK.
So AC et al, how do you know that damage was done? They don't even want to let the UK court see it.
I think it's more a case of (in this case):
UK: "Lets look at all the facts, before deciding whether he should punished by sending him to a different country to face a biased trial".
Your version of the US: "Kill, Kill, Kill".
Of course, you're another internet tough guy, sitting behind a wall which makes you invisible.
Having to wonder if you would be desperately trying to stoke your blood lust if it was a member of your own family.... ? No? thought not.
And i'm still trying to find all the same responses from people like you for the "IT Security Expert" probably being paid lots and lots of money which allow a mentally disabled guy to break into one of the most secure networks in the world under his / her watch.... anyone?
LOL, I'm sure if the Ernest Saunders defence fails he'll try the Pinochet methodology of avoiding extradition and failing that we'll all be subject to mass hysteria from the rent-an-excuse-for-Gary-cos-we-are-limp-liberals-and-don't-like-the-nasty-US-of-fucking-A crowd.
Personally, I'd wish he was extradited as soon as possible to stop this freaking crass saga of sympathy for a nobody that broke the law. FFS, Mitnick broke the law and did his time, what makes poor little Gary and his "oh dear I seem to have suddenly developed an illness when ALL of my options for avoiding extradition have failed. Please take pity on poor little me, flutter-flutter/puppy dogs eyes"** any different?
Gary, you shouldn't have done it, if you hadn't then you wouldn't be in this position, would you?
Paris, because if she can, "Young Gary" can...!
**My personal view of events only.
Time to send Gary on a field trip to the USA. He did the crime now it's time to do his time. End of story.
What an original and thoughtful comment.
..hacking federal databases has been reclassified as a misdemeanour, so he should be fine :P
The fraud being taking millions of US tax dollars for the designated purpose of finding alien life, and systematically destroying the evidence it gets of UFOs. No wonder they are after McKinnon with such determination - what might he know about doctored pictures?
Is there any authority figure that Whacky Jacqui will not bend over for? Speak up - doubtless something can be arranged for your jaded palette. (You will of course be handsomely disbursed from the public teat for your service).
+1 for a bent Whacky icon.
I'm glad I don't know you. You sound like a thoroughly unpleasant little troll.
and Deja Vu
and indeed @ Deja Vu
Can we please have a belming icon.
How long has he been in the legal system ~3yrs? Do those 3 yrs count against any further punishment? How much more can they (do they want to) possibly punish this guy? And what damage did he actually *cause* (ie. not clean-up effort to secure wide-open systems but actual computers he crashed/files he destroyed?)
William Gladstone apparently thought so. Not forgetting Magna Carta. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice."
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
Wait, are they talking about McKinnon or a Batman villain?
Title says it all.
And what sort of "time" would you imagine is acceptable for his crime?
He committed the crime in the UK. He should be tried in the UK, under UK laws.
What's the problem?
Their comment was timed nicely though, as 16:22 would of been approximately the time it would of taken to get home from school, grab a can of pop from the fridge and write that comment.
To be fair, I'm not sure that Asperger's really counts as a mental disability when it comes to breaking into computers, or doing computer work in general.
For a lot of people, it's primarily a social disability, not affecting focus or intellect, so if someone with Asperger's breaks into a machine, that's no worse a reflection on the security than if someone without Asperger's.
That said, it does seem like the security of these machines was pretty shit and badly managed, and of all the people who break into machines (apart from people employed by the owner to test security), a loner obsessively looking for information that doesn't exist is probably rather better than someone just doing it for the challenge or to brag about it, and *far* better than someone looking to cause damage or extract confidential information.
It seems typically the case that people who should have kept machines secure will try to cover their backside by bigging-up the skill/persistence/etc of the intruder, but that's something that people should bear in mind before poking around in other people's machines
No, I don't pretend to be an internet tough guy, I just know for a fact that he has admitted to committing a crime and as such fully deserves to be shipped off to wherever he need go to be properly processed.
If my brother, to follow your example, had hacked into china and published Obama's speech in full (which had been censored by them) then it's reasonable to assume that he's knowingly commited a crime and so cheerio, enjoy china.
"And i'm still trying to find all the same responses from people like you for the "IT Security Expert" probably being paid lots and lots of money which allow a mentally disabled guy to break into one of the most secure networks in the world under his / her watch.... anyone?" <-- completely irrelevant to the case at hand, if I leave my back door open and someone comes in then they've still broken the law. Or if I left my car unlocked with my laptop in it, if someone went into my car and snooped around on my laptop sure I'd be an idiot but that doesn't make it any more legal. Your point is solely relevant to an investigation on how it happened, not who did it.
If I rape someone and my defence was that I didn't believe in consent and I didn't believe her when she said it was her time of the month and I wanted to know the facts that doesn't make it any more legal. How this chump has any support is beyond me, he's a criminal.
Looks like some people should read up on what McKinnon did instead of blindly believing the "biggest military hack of all times" lie. He did not do any cracking actually. He connected to wide open computers (which is not an excuse, I know), had a look around, spotted other intruders, engaged in friendly discussion with at least one of the "hacked" computers' operators and kindly told them that their system was a piece of swiss cheese. All the from the UK of course. So, yes he's a nutter. No, he shouldn't have done it. But he didn't cause any damage (the preposterous damage claims are the maintenance costs to plug the holes he allerted them about. How ridiculous is that?).
The poor guy embarassed the wrong people. Apparently it's all it takes to be considered as a terrorist these days. (alternatively, you can take pictures of a school or a gov building. Or a cop.)
He's already admitted doing it; Asperger's would only be a valid defence if it actually meant that either he could not tell that what he was doing was illegal - utterly absurd - or that he could not control himself. How on earth is it any kind of excuse?
I want to see him punished properly for breaking into these computers - whatever price you might put on the intrusion, it's still a crime. Since the victims were in the US, that should be where he gets prosecuted, sentenced and punished. I object to Russia shielding Russian criminals from prosecution for their crimes abroad - it would be hyprocritical of me to support the UK shielding a UK criminal, particularly where the foreign legal system is one in which I have far more faith than the UK's own!
the UK-USA extradition treaty is a one-sided abomination that Blair and the rest of Bush's poodles rolled over and begged for
now the UK allows extradition to the USA on the flimsiest of grounds, do it in the other direction? dream on suckers!
Blair got that medal for caring more about the USA than the UK, as PM that's treason
flames for the second step in Blair's hanging drawing and quartering
If he went in through an open door then it's analogous to trespass.
If he was trespassing with intent to steal murder or rape then its burglary; otherwise it's a civil matter.
As for Asperger's being a defence - it's not a defence against the crime; it's a defence against extradition which would leave him with an unfair trial.
All trials must be fair even if the guilt is incontrovertible - if one trial is unfair then it brings the whole justice system into question.
The real crime is the one-sided extradition treaty and I have to say that calling it treason appeals to me.
Almost exactly the opposite of the A-Team.
A) What they want him for (the crime on the extradition order) was not a crime when committed
B) Ex posto facto laws are unconstitutional in the US
C) If he is counted as having dome this in the US, he's covered by the constitution and so the law cannot be applied
D) Therefore the extradition is not legal.
" He did not do any cracking actually. He connected to wide open computers (which is not an excuse, I know),"
Of course it's a fucking excuse! Or do you want to be looking at up to 70 years in the clink for pointing your browser at http://www.cia.gov?
Time for this shit to end. An unprotected computer with a public IP is a public space. there are plenty of non-routable IP's to go round all you numbnuts.
When was the last time Americans sent of their own to another country to face justice?
Not that one-sided. It seems damn near impossible to extradite anyone from the UK. Extraditees (is that a word?) seem to be able to fight it indefinitely.
Wow you would send your brother to be incarcerated in China for publishing a speech? You would fit in really well in Orwells 1984. We need more people like you.
"if I leave my back door open and someone comes in then they've still broken the law" - No actually you are completely wrong. If they steal something from your house they have committed theft, but if they just walk in through a door you left open they have committed no crime.
"he's a criminal." What a black and white world you live in. Have you never commited any crime in your life? Ever record a TV programme on a video recorder? Broken the speed limit, even by going 31 in a 30 zone (bear in mind speedometers are not 100% accurate)? Copied a CD or tape from anybody? Not put your seatbelt on?
Mind you, there *is* a difference between crime and offense.
On related news, prosecution is asking for 5 years behind the bars for botnet herder who stole hundreds of thousands of online bank passwords -from work*. When you compare the "crimes", McKinnon prolly deserves a few tens of hours of community service. Hardly worth the deportation, is it? (not to mention that there is no valid reason why he should face US, and not UK, justice in the first place)
If your shoelace comes undone in the street you commit a crime.
1) You stop and cause an obstruction doing it up
2) You don't stop and cause a public menace with your dangerous undone shoelace
3) You step into a doorway or otherwise off the street, committing trespass, to do it up.
Just having committed some insignificant little crime... well it says in British law "De minimis non curat lex" - the law doesn't care about insignificant little things. Like what he did or like doing your shoelace up on a public footpath.
If after all the legal hurdles, this could be poetic justice if McKinnon is extradited and lands in a U.S. prison for a few decades/
So you walk into a carpark, next to your car there is another car with its door wide open, on the seat is a wallet with a load of cash and a switched on laptop.
a. ignore it, it's not my problem or
b. have a shufty to see if you can identify the owner and inform him of his potential loss
As a normal person you might think risking 5 years hard in a foreign jail is not worth the hassle, let someone else do it but if you have aspergers the only thought is b. not for one moment do you think that some deviant t**t will call the cops on you for doing what is the the right thing.
He could very well have been trying to be helpful. When you or I try to be helpful, we do it for the selfish inner glow we get, basking in the thanks we get, if we get no thanks we just shrug it off with a 'miserable...'.
Aspergers people try to be helpful because they have been conditioned to believe that that is what others want, when their help is rebuffed they take it heart and believe that they have done something wrong (which is why he admitted it)
You and me can suss out when someone is trying to pull the wool over our eyes, people with this condition have no concept that anybody would even try.
Just take his computer off him and give him something useful to do with his time.
"Of course it's a fucking excuse! Or do you want to be looking at up to 70 years in the clink for pointing your browser at http://www.cia.gov? Time for this shit to end. An unprotected computer with a public IP is a public space. there are plenty of non-routable IP's to go round all you numbnuts."
Well, from what I gathered, he did "crack" the password in a remote access software. The cracking was not really difficult (brute-force attack with a 1-word list: the default). But still, it was illegal when he did it. Not criminal, but still illegal. So he must be punished. Something like community service sounds fine. Of course the time he wasted fighting the preposterous extradition demand should probably be substracted.
You mean it's possible to be a hacker and not have Asperger's Syndrome? Was he diagnosed by the fact he only made eye-contact with the Judge's shoes?
Quote from BBC site:
"His lawyers had previously told the High Court that if he were removed from his family and sent to the US, his condition was likely to give rise to psychosis or suicide."
"I am very controlled, which is probably not a good thing, but inside the fires of hell are burning. It's not a good place to be."
If I'm stopped for speeding, I know my defence. A previosly undiagnosed condition and an over-protectivce mother.
c. ransack the car looking for evidence of UFOs.
@"Justice delayed is justice denied ! "
"And what sort of "time" would you imagine is acceptable for his crime?"
I don't know what crime if any he has committed. That's for the USA courts to decide, and unless he's extradited, we'll never know.
this is more akin to going into somebodys house, and going through their medical files, then claiming its ok because you were just curious and the upstairs window wasnt locked. if he had just stumbled across the info, thats one thing, but he went deliberatly looking for classified data on Goverment systems, including ones dealing dealing security and defense. The difficutly he had in getting in to the system is irrelevent. the fact he told a user he was in the system, and what if any damage he did, is to be dertermined by the courts and will affect sentencing, but does not mean he does not get charged.
According to an interview with the BBC back at the start of this debacle, it wasn't a list of passwords, he was looking for machines with no password at all, or in other words a zero length string.
I wonder if you can crack a zero length string?
The U.S. has the right to extradite and prosecute McKinnon because the crimes occured in the U.S. Gary has had no medical problems for the sudden onset of ASSHOLE syndrome, so Gary should do his prison time in the U.S. where the crimes were committed.
The bogus legal proceedings he and his lawyers have created to prevent proper extradition to the U.S., are a farce. Hope he ends up in the slammer for 30 years.
I'm not sure about that... If I stand in England and throw a rock over the border into Scotland and break a window, where did I comit the crime? To me the only answer that makes sense is that the crime was committed in both places. Maybe in England though I only threw a rock: the criminal damage was in Scotland.
So if the seppos want to prosecute him it seems to me they're quite entitled to, and it seems to me its most logical the prosecution should be where the most serious aspect of the crime happened. If it was my window in Scotland I'd be pretty unhappy if the guy was let off with a warning by the english cops because he didn't do any damage in England.
"Not that one-sided. It seems damn near impossible to extradite anyone from the UK. Extraditees (is that a word?) seem to be able to fight it indefinitely."
Tell that to the Natwest three.
I don't see the USA coughing up the PIRA terrrorists that the UK wants to stand trial.
The facts are simple, check for yourself, under a treaty intended to ease extradition of terrorists, the UK readily extradites white collar crims, while the USA protects people wanted for terrorism.
Time to prosecute McKinnon and throw his worthless arse in the slammer for 50 years.
Gathered from where?
And having such poor security is tantamount to treason and is at the very least criminal negligence for government security work.
Yet they are all still A-OK...
The guy hacked and got caught. Too F'en bad. Go to America and be punished for the crime. Don't be a crybaby. No one gives a shit about his B.S. Aspbergers Syndrome that was conveniently discovered after he got caught. Tough Shit. Get over it Chap. You hacked, now you go to prison in America. I hope you learn your lesson.
The Aspe's I know would stick the the letter of the law. They tend to take things very literally, and logically.
In the US you can't walk just walk into someone's house uninvited. Even if the door is wide open, its breaking and entering. You'd get arrested for that.
People in the UK must have very different idea's about private property.
A US court will quite happily try a defendant who has been kidnapped from another country--no need for extradition.
A UK court will not.
And US courts have also held that their Constitution does not protect non-citizens.
None of this has anything to do with Bush, and it makes the current Extradition Treaty even more of an abuse of human rights.
Anyone, with the precise legal details to hand, willing to write to the US President?
So, we can soon expect the airmen in the (A-10 "Friendly" fire) incident to be extradited?
Don't hold your breath. They weren't.