Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
And here was me thinking the Cairns Post would have some nice pics of the wonderful shaggable Jungle Jane, instead it is just some guy.
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
...following "intelligence-based inquiries" - Code for - "We waited him on that friggin' alley."
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
Ahh, the return of the old "Swap the image whilst no-ones looking" trick.
If that is in fact the shag-doll in question on the Cairns Post website, its amazingly life-like, if unnecessarily ugly. With a beard.
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
Shouldn't he be charged with 'breaking and entering and entering'?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
to the use of "perv" in this case. Criminal, yes. Weird, yes. Sad, yes. Perv? How?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
So the police didn't issue the suspect's name but the Cairns Post is quite happy to show a picture of *someone* thus publicly identifying them before the trial?
If he is found guilty then by all means call the suspect the "Jungle Jane Shagger", but until then shouldn't they be referred to as the alleged Jungle Jane Shagger?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
makes the reasons for his behaviour clear...
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
He is charged with two counts of entering premices with intent and one count of breaking in.
So he burgled the shop three time and raided the bar next door which covers the four counts of entering the premices with intent so is the charge for "attempted break-in" intended to cover the alleged rape of the Jungle Jane blow up doll?
If this is the case then the "attempted" part is just vindictive. Its a rubber doll. You either break it in or you dont. Its not as though its going to fight back. Then again from the look of the photo of the suspected perp , he does look like someone who could loose a fight with a blow up doll.
Mines the one with the bicycle pump in one pocket and the hand cuffs in the other
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
The article linked to in the Cairns Post has a rather unfortunate quote from a policeman involved in it:
"...we attended a Manunda address..."
Not sure he was the man under Jungle Jane though...
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
Or is he, erm, strapped for cash? Or does he just not like washing the thing afterwards?
If he gets off on the robbery -- pal, they aren't feeling violated. You are wanking into a piece of inflated plastic.
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:55 GMT
If the dolls are at all damaged after his activities, will he be charged with Entering and Breaking?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 13:57 GMT
Anyone else reckon the charges will be inflated?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 15:06 GMT
@ AC 13:32 GMT,
Yes, the charges will probably be blown up out of all proportion,
Paris, cos she knows how to blow.
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 15:06 GMT
Judging by that picture, no wonder he was shagging inflatable sex-toys. What real woman (or man, for that matter) would want to shag *that*?
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 16:26 GMT
Maybe he just wanted to try them out first before making a purchase. Most people do that sort of thing with shoes -- you know, try to find something that fits.
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 16:26 GMT
http://www.premiumtoyz.co.uk/sexshop/product_info.php/info/p3192_love-doll-Jungle-Jane.html
Posted Wednesday 21st January 2009 19:39 GMT
He is considered a perv by both sides of the moral fence:
"Sex doesn't exist" side - because he was performing the act
"Sex is enjoyable" side - because he was abusing and wasting perfectly good dolls.
Posted Thursday 22nd January 2009 10:28 GMT
I'm sure that the dolls will rest easy now.
Posted Thursday 22nd January 2009 14:33 GMT
I suppose you could say that he was pretty hard up.
Back to the article
