Face blur, bah! #
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 16:28 GMT
Why blur the face when it was published on Facebook, as well as various media outlets. eg: http://www.stuff.co.nz/4816461a11.html
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 16:28 GMT
Why blur the face when it was published on Facebook, as well as various media outlets. eg: http://www.stuff.co.nz/4816461a11.html
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 16:40 GMT
Queenstown Police has tagged you in a photo...
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 17:01 GMT
This is how the NZ Police image now appears in Facebook. It was un-blurred when they were looking to identify him, now that they have, he's an 'alleged' burgler and so they have to protect his identity.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
It's nice to know that it's not only our yoofs that are thick as shit.
On a complete tangent, shouldn't the Title inputbox be allowed to fill it's container, and not be constrained to 258px?
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
Good to see good old Kiwi have a go is alive and well. Got a safe to crack and only an angle grinder and a crowbar? No worries, you'll find a way. Now if only he had thought to bring along the #8 wire . . .
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
that blocky, no wonder someone recognised him.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
I can't believe that NZ's finest needed Facebook for this. How hard can it be to find the only bloke in town with a face like an overcompressed JPEG?
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
If facebook is the polis now then it had better start applying for overtime straight away.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 20:21 GMT
... & El Reg has to keep it's legal integrity because until the trial, he is still only 'accused.'
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 23:32 GMT
He was doing this in a small room which is described as "rather warm at the best of times" and he took his balaclava off because he was sweating.
They showed the footage of him on the TV news when he spotted the camera in the roof. It was priceless watching his face falling faster than Paris Hilton's knickers at the first sign of a video camera.
And they identified him in one day.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 23:32 GMT
The alleged perp didn't see several hundred $$ in coins on the shelf behind him.
FAIL.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 23:32 GMT
I'm sure that the TV news services showing the CCTV footage (not just a still) and taking the piss out of the guy probably had something to do with it; he had the balaclava down at first, but pulled it up when he, supposedly, started getting a bit toasty.
Paris, because she also likes peeling off in front of a camera.
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 23:32 GMT
"On a complete tangent, shouldn't the Title inputbox be allowed to fill it's container, and not be constrained to 258px?"
Posted Tuesday 13th January 2009 23:32 GMT
Fair enough. What irritates me is news reports that say that somebody is "alleged" to have done something, even *after* that person has been found guilty and sentenced for the crime.
But then again, why don't we go the whole hog and insist that because accused people (generally, not specific to this case) are *supposedly* innocent until proved guilty, they shouldn't have their NAMES disclosed publicly unless and until they are found guilty.
Posted Wednesday 14th January 2009 11:00 GMT
So do I expect to find 'Arrest' next to 'Throw a chicken at' then?
Posted Wednesday 14th January 2009 11:00 GMT
What a complete tool.
Posted Wednesday 14th January 2009 11:00 GMT
They saw someone stealing transformers from a billboard so took a photo and published it on their own billboard. Classic, great use of the old K.I.*
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4771229a11.html
*(Kiwi Ingenuity)
Posted Wednesday 14th January 2009 11:00 GMT
See title.