Twitter's veracity chewed up by Britney's four-foot vagina
hikaricore
hah! #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 05:36 GMT

I honestly can't stop laughing.
This is the best thing ever.
Anonymous Coward
Proper name for users #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 05:36 GMT

Surely the proper name for the users of this service is "twits", not "tweets". Twits as in plural form of twit. Twit, as in one who Twitters.
Mine's the one with the dog-eared copy of the OED in the pockets. (careful, it's really heavy!)
Anonymous Coward
hmph. #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 05:36 GMT

Could do without the last word in the title... C'mon show *some* class =p
Diogenies
Gadzooks ! #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT

You mean something that was posted on the internet isn't true .
jake
@AC ... What's wrong with "vagina"? #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT
"Could do without the last word in the title"
Seriously, what's wrong with the word vagina?
"C'mon show *some* class"
You expect "class" in an article that mentions Britney Spears, Fox News, and social networking?
As you say ... C'mon ...
David Harper
Re Proper name for users #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT
gabor
@Anon #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT
OMFG get the hell outta here with this PC BS.
Anonymous Coward
@Proper name for users #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT

I think there is an even more proper name you could call these users, especially the ones who read Britney's story.
Paris, because her vagina has bigger teeth than Britney's
Andy Worth
Re:hmph #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT
Yes but...
"a confession from pop celeb Spears that her vagina was four feet wide 'with razor sharp teeth.'"
has got to be the funniest thing I will read today.
TeeCee
Re: Proper name for users. #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT

I agree. However, the pronunciation notes in my copy suggest that the "w" is silent.....
Steen Hive
@proper name for users #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT

"Twats" more like.
"Britney's toothy twat twitted"
Allan Dyer
Tiger = 4 foot pussy with razor-sharp teeth #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT

Is it possible Britney made a perfectly innocent remark about sponsoring a tiger at some zoo?
Ground Rush
@Anonymous Coward #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:05 GMT

What do you suggest, fairy? furburger? minge? twat?
Anonymous Coward
Haha #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:05 GMT
That is the best title ever. I don't really understand the hostility towards twitter users that inevitably pops up in comment threads after articles that mention it though. This is the internet. Occasionally you're going to come across people doing things you don't like, and as that particular scale goes, twittering is pretty innocous.
Ken Hagan
To its credit... #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:05 GMT
"To its credit, and unlike many of its peers, Twitter gives users the option of surfing the vast majority of the site with the use of the secure sockets layer protocol, a measure that makes it harder for scammers to trick their prey."
It also turns you into a terrorist, though, since Jacqui/Phorm can't see what you're doing, unless they've forced you to use that "man-in-the-middle router" that I saw on comp.risks yesterday. (In the future, all internet traffic will be encrypted by default, but we'll be forced to give the keys to the authorities, who will stick them in the Uberbase, which they then make available to a few million stakeholders.)
Sarah Bee
Re: Haha #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:05 GMT

It's a good point. Why can't we all just get along? It's almost as if people *enjoy* getting enraged and feeling superior over nothing.
Gulfie
@AC "Ha Ha" #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:32 GMT

It's the self-importance of the twats that twitter that gets me. Like it actually means something...
Anonymous Coward
At least... #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 11:47 GMT

...Britney's four-foot vagina wasn't chewed up by Twitter's veracity. Now that'd be something to see. (not)
HFoster
Re: Re: Haha #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 12:03 GMT

*dies laughing*
If Sarah Bee isn't a candidate for Editor in Chief of this place, there's something wrong with El Reg!
The Mysterious Panda
@ Sarah Bee #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 12:03 GMT
"It's almost as if people *enjoy* getting enraged and feeling superior over nothing."
Well of *course* we do. That's why the internet was invented :)
Mister_C
@ AC / follow up to Ground Rush post #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:09 GMT
We had to find a suitable alternative word in the office after complaints about the C word by some of our office. Roll on a few web searches and we all agreed on "Pompom". Jamaican slang, apparently.
Jerome
scampaigns? #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:09 GMT
Come on, own up - you're just trying to make up words ready for 2009's list of the most annoying neologisms.
James Pickett
Cults #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:09 GMT
Might this affect the cult of celebrity? If nearly everything connected with celebs gets fouled up then perhaps the shine will begin to wear off. I do hope so.
David Taylor
@Gulfie #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:14 GMT

It's not the twitters, tweeters, or whatever you want to call them that appear to have delusions of self-importance, at least in this comment thread.
Graham Marsden
@Sarah Bee #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:31 GMT

> It's almost as if people *enjoy* getting enraged and feeling superior over nothing.
Have you never read the Daily Mail...?!
Tom
Not at all related, #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:33 GMT

But someone mentioned the funniest thing they've seen all day.
WELL..... has anyone seen the picture of Jacqui Smith posing for the '2009 Government Charity Calendar' posted on news biscuit?
You Haven't!?!?! I best put that right :D
http://newsbiscuit.com/article/cabinet-issues-nude-charity-calendar-432
Give that man a milkshake, i love it :)
Pierre
Ha, twitter.... #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:33 GMT
The (in)famous blog 2.0 tool finally found a suitable use. Too bad they froze the accounts. Looks like some celebs will have to go back to the old press release method to keep the world informed of their bowel movements. Unfortunately the non-celeb who had their account compromised cannot do the same. I hope the world can survive without knowing when Joe Bloggs goes potty -in real time.
Dave
Appropriate? #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 16:39 GMT
"The exception was the hijacked account of President-elect Barack Obama, which directed followers to visit a website that attempted to steal personal information"
Given the way the US wants all our details to travel there, and the supposed spying activities they undertake, this is sort of appropriate. Unless Obama manages to reverse the stampeding elephants.
Nebulo
@Ken Hagan #
Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 20:51 GMT

Not altogether sure you should mention "secure sockets" in this context ...