Hmm, Stealth Drone #
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:12 GMT
Hope they get the electronics spot on, Can you imagine them "Loosing" it!
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:12 GMT
Hope they get the electronics spot on, Can you imagine them "Loosing" it!
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:26 GMT
..am really sick of robot jokes ;o)
If they are making robot shooters, isn't it time they started making robot targets? I mean, it's only fair.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:26 GMT
Welcome our new robotic stealth flying wing overloads. Sorry, overlords.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:26 GMT
Does anybody else think this looks like it was designed at apple?
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:26 GMT
but we know it was us that scorched the skys etc etc
i'm only using that quote because I can't remember the "and then it became self aware " one from terminator.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:37 GMT
I suddenly have images of that movie....oh dear.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:40 GMT
That looks suspiciously like the Martian war machines from the Jeff Wayne's LP "War of the Worlds"
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:40 GMT
... for about 7-8 years now, that with today's technology, you can replace most pilots with software. I figure you can replace 50% of a Navy's Warfare Officers with software, too.
Alas, since Admirals serve no useful function, I have not yet figured out how to replace them.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:40 GMT
I hope the damn thing flies more level than it sits on the ground. There's not a single level line in the whole picture.
Yeah, I know I'm being picky, but it's a bloody press photo...
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 11:58 GMT
It'll be like a live action version of the Carrier Command game.
Quick question - Why does it need that "cockpit" when its a robot? Surely it just needs a camera.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:14 GMT
Unmanned? My hairy arse it is
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:14 GMT
For a properly prepared and combat ready Mig or Eurofighter.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:18 GMT
Yeah, kinda beat me too it, I was all "autonomous armed stealth plane — seen that before...". Luckily I never got to see the movie but even from the trailers I could very well make out that this is something that pretty much has no other choice than to go very, very wrong. And different from C-movies with A-budgets you cannot simply employ some ludicrous plot device in order to clean up the mess.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:18 GMT
"Quick question - Why does it need that "cockpit" when its a robot? Surely it just needs a camera."
Duh, so the robot can see out!
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:24 GMT
Maybe I am just welcoming our autonomous stealth killing overlords, but that is such a good picture I want it as my desktop. And may enforce it on all the marks I administer.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:24 GMT
Just the windscreen makes you wonder... do they have a robot sitting in it flying it?? Is it a full-on plane capable of being flown by a fleshy but the clever bit is they made an android to fly it instead?
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 12:27 GMT
For human pilots, yes. However, the F/A-18's fully automated ILS hits the 3rd wire each time. It does it so well, that it is very seldom used as it provides the pilot with an unfair advantages (your traps are scored by your squadron mates as part of an internal squadron "competition").
And on a cat launch, the Hornet driver needs to grab (with both hands) the hand holds at the top front of the cockpit before being launched.. at that part is fully automated.
So I fail to see why UAV launches and traps would be a big deal when these are already successfully automated in the F/A-18.
The big deal instead is, "Can the UAV, without human intelligence onboard, operate as well?". What happens with lost radio comms? Jamming? Sudden changes (as there often are) in the combat environment that requires an immediate and fast tactical response? Know fact that computers can do specific things "better" than humans - like hitting the 3rd wire. Also a know fact that even the most advanced computers fail miserably at tasks that requires common sense.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
I thought that was one big air inlet for the engine, not a window....
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
Do you not see the faint red blip there? It's a Cylon.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
"computers can do specific things "better" than humans - like hitting the 3rd wire"
Indeed. Docking was easier in Elite with the docking computer, too. What are those pilots squealing about? Man up and get with the programme (and, indeed, the program), for goodness' sake! :-)
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
That's the air intake to the jet, not a window !
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
"Also a know fact that even the most advanced computers fail miserably at tasks that requires common sense."
So the implication is that most of our politicians have been replaced by computers? I should have known....
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
> won't be looking forward to telling their children that there's no longer any way to win one's glorious wings of gold and the respect of the nation
Not to mention it'll make it much more difficult to try to get Kelly McGillis' knickers off in the Ladies Room...
... Mine's the one with the off-key copy of "You've Lost That Loving Feeling" in the pocket.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:49 GMT
It's not the cockpit, it's the air intake.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:51 GMT
>The big deal instead is, "Can the UAV, without human intelligence onboard, operate as well?". What happens with lost radio comms? Jamming? Sudden changes (as there often are) in the combat environment that requires an immediate and fast tactical response?
Exactly. The Human Brain is a 100 billion Neurons "computer" which has been trained for, well 1 million years ? 10 million years ? It operates under all possible radio modes (silence, local messaging, long-range comms, satcom) and can make the right decision "on the spot".
The most valuable computer inside an F-18 is in fact the wetware sitting in the cockpit. But nobody said you could not augment this "master" system with a ton of less-intelligent-than-ants processors.
Some theorists are thinking of a manned “Master” aircraft controlling a swarm of robots through low-power, low-bandwidth radio messages. Lasers could be used for local comms, too. These stealth aircraft are all intended to be used against sophisticated adversaries with lots of signals intelligence electronics at their disposal (countries like Russia and China). Operating in low (or zero) power radio modes may prove to be essential.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 13:53 GMT
"Also a know fact that even the most advanced computers fail miserably at tasks that requires common sense."
It's also a known fact that even the most advanced humans fail miserably at tasks that require common sense too. Puny fleshlings.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 16:00 GMT
has that flag been screwed up in a box all its life?
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 16:00 GMT
I think this is the one your after....
"The Skynet Funding Bill is passed. The system goes on-line August 4th, 1997. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug."
Paris.... I dunno, something funny involving human decisions being removed or pulling the plug, I'll leave it up to you lot, it's been one of those days.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 19:33 GMT
>The Skynet Funding Bill is passed.
I thing that we have to realize some "Computer Scientists" in the "Artificial Intelligence" field are actually Used Car Salesmen who figured they could earn more by telling fairy tales and pocketing Government Money. I am talking about Marvin Minsky, for example.
Computers don't challenge a five-year old in any task they are not specifically programmed to do. Marvin Minsky is just a Moron extracting money from the government with his statements ("we will have an artificial brain by 2001" or something to this effect)
Just try to wire up 100 billion nonlinear elements (each dozens of transistors) AND then wire them up so that each element is wired to 10000 other elements. That's 1 TRILLION WIRES !
But first, figure the right wiring....
If you get that done, you probably need a 1000 MW power station and a football field to run your artificial brain. Maybe we can do that by 2050, maybe not.
Anyway, I can just get a guy, a pretty girl, wait 15 years and do everything at about 100W power consumption to reach the same objectives.
Paris, because she is able to produce 20 of those nice little 100W extremely-high-performance processors :-)
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 19:33 GMT
Nonsense. From what I hear, the future's not set and there's no fate but what we make for ourselves.
Or in other words, we're doomed.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 19:33 GMT
I wave my hand at the dumb lumps of lead that want to eat this waste of money, I thought that this stuff was because pilots is too expensive to let die. Actually, if they have been practising shooting wump-rats on Tatoonine, they are cheap.
And do you think that people will get patriotic over our robots vs their robots? No sir. Not unless the robots turn up in a wheelchair, shed a tear at the national anthem and suck ass when given a medal.
We are sending Pacman to war, not Wall-e.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 19:43 GMT
Wasn't there a fleet of Star Destroyers that hyperjumped from system to system at random intervals so it wasn't able to be detected? Is this iPlane going to just circle the target, I mean, Earth waiting for it's next mission or refueling?
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 21:19 GMT
"For a properly prepared and combat ready Mig or Eurofighter." - Well, ignoring the issue that there ISN'T really a properly prepared Eurofighter, I doubt that's its intended function. The US has largely shifted its military policy from nukes and high-tech fighters to 'how many brown people with sticks can we kill today?'.
Posted Thursday 18th December 2008 22:25 GMT
Wait, wait, wait, wait... are you telling me that I've got it wrong, and that I actually need to, for one, welcome our miniscule multisegemented hard carapaced six limbed hive mind Queen Ant overlord, she whom commands the winged autonomotons bearing lethal silicon death from yon clouded skies above?
Black Helos - who flys the watchants watching the other ants?
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 00:41 GMT
Here's a hint: YOU CAN'T SEE THE HANGAR REFLECTED IN AN AIR INTAKE. Duh!
Now, as to why they'd need the huge expanse of glass, I dunno. Maybe to fit an IMAX camera for the latest blockbuster (sic) hit?
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 00:45 GMT
So any bets on how long it will be before some peasant with a $25 AK shoots down one of these and sells the bits to China?
Thanks
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 23:37 GMT
Cylon.??? What are they doing with tea up there??? T
They have a tea drinking robot ...now that is impressive...wonder if it has it's own robo butler to bring the tea...
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 23:37 GMT
Actually, docking was easier in Elite with the docking computer switched off. That thing had a death-wish.
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 23:37 GMT
um... no. It IS an air intake. Perhaps one with a reflective plastic cover to keep out prying eyes and unwanted bits, but an intake nonetheless.
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/military_photos_20052151.aspx
BTW, will someone PLEASE send these id10ts copies of the Terminator movies before it's too...
Wait, who are you and how did you get in here? AUUUUUGGHH!
end.
Posted Friday 19th December 2008 23:37 GMT
This is a stealth aircraft, not a dog fighter. It's designed to carry out missions like any other UAV but is designed to be nearly invisible to radar. One would think that it's main mission would be to deliver ordnance to specific static targets. Although it has nearly an unlimited range, the hang time over a specific point is limited since the required fuel tankers are not stealthed. However, just getting in and out unseen with pictures of the enemy is a big plus for the war machine.
Posted Saturday 20th December 2008 08:13 GMT
Doesn't look like a window to me...
http://www.is.northropgrumman.com/systems/nucasx47b_assets/photos/low/0012.jpg
Posted Saturday 20th December 2008 19:43 GMT
It's not a frakkin' air intake or window, I tells ya.
It's that black bit with the red blip that goes whoop, whoop... whoop, whoop... For the last time, it's a frakkin' Cylon.
The link you gave
http://www.is.northropgrumman.com/systems/nucasx47b_assets/photos/low/0012.jpg
... just shows a happy space invader. (Why? Cos he's just landed at the northrop grumman base innit?)
L2id_your_alienz_plz
Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 11:44 GMT
Any one ever see a nice looking Navy-like remote controlled B2 bomber? (Take a look and see if this does not look like the B2?)
Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 11:44 GMT
so they have the remote control steath aircraift , now they just need the remote tanks next
Posted Monday 22nd December 2008 20:55 GMT
that they're worshipping it by candle light.