To be fair ...

England have never had a particularly stellar record when playing on the subcontinent, although their recent performances eclipse practically everything else in terms of sheer ineptitude (possible exception for Andrew Strauss, though)

I would suggest 3 as an alternative sponsor, since this is the average number of overs that need to be bowled before the batting lineup goes into meltdown. Sadly, if memory serves, 3 already have a deal with one of the Test nations (possibly Australia - don't recall offhand)

Paris, 'cos she seems to have experience with balls and bits of wood ..

How about...

A. Jones Manure Handling as a sponsor.

They could also have a fleet of Delorean's to ferry them around too ;)

Better coverage?

Perhaps restricting live cricket to the relatively tiny proportion with Sky isn't the best way to get the most from your advertising budget.

@Simon Ward

Surely 3 is the number of days a test lasts when England are playing

@ Steve

Very true indeed, I follow them closely on TMS & in the press but don't have Sky, & wouldn't even have been able to name Vodafone as their sponsor.

Oh, not more $20 matches either. Such a shame.

Tim#3

Paris, cos she enjoys the game from the member's end