The ISC handlers' diary includes a screenshot of the exploit code:

http://handlers.sans.org/bzdrnja/xml.png

that, although mildly obfuscated, contains all the search terms anyone needs

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=SPAN+DATASRC%3D%23I+DATAFLD%3DC+DATAFORMATAS%3DHTML&btnG=Search&meta=

to seek out a copy of the exploit itself:

http://www.fuckhacker.net/?action=show&id=313

I was waiting for you to correct the way they speak in London.

They don't speak like that in America, yet it's funny how many people seek to 'correct' their grammar.

They just don't get it, Scott.

They should read the Japanese posts and correct their grammar. Now *that's a challenge!

They should do this more often.

If an exploit is already available underground for 15k a pop and someone gives it away for free, who gets hurt........?

It might be a sensible change of tactic to make a point of reverse-engineering and releasing FOSS versions of existing exploit packages and take the profit motivation out of the coding side of the business altogether.

Yes we believe you. Of course it was an accident!

There is already a massive community dedicated to the development and understanding of exploits and sharing them in an open and full-disclosure manner; see milw0rm or metasploit for more information. (A couple of years ago I would have suggested regularly reading the full-disclosure list, but it's got a lamentably low SNR these days; still comes out with some gems now and again though.)

Researchers need Porsches too.

I'm sure that incident with the Rosenbergs was just an accident too.

You don't write in Mandarin. You speak it. Chinese script is comprehended by all readers, regardless of their dialect. Properly it is Chinese, or Hanzi.