The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Facebook ignores huge security hole for four months

Moss Icely Spaceport

Easier answer 

Stop

Just don't use Facebook/Myspace et al.

I don't have any use for such on-line tat.

James Roper

NoScript won't help you. 

The NoScript plugin can't help you with any Facebook security vulnerabilities... To use Facebook, you need Javascript, so you need Facebook whitelisted in the NoScript configuration. Because it's whitelisted, you are now vulnerable to any XSS attacks, because XSS vulnerabilities usually mean injecting Javascript into files that are sourced from Facebook. So, either you use Facebook, and are vulnerable whether you have NoScript installed or not, or you don't use Facebook, in which case you don't need NoScript to protect you.

Anonymous Coward

Is it just me... 

or do the examples not work?

James O'Brien

"an ugly worm dubbed Koobface" 

Coat

Am I the only one who read this as Knobface?

/yes yes I'm gone

Ropata

But James, XSS is *remote* script! 

Boffin

NoScript is able to distinguish XSS from JavaScript running locally. Its XSS filter even remains active when you allow js globally. For example embedded Youtude vids are blocked until you explicitly allow them.

And *everybody* should use NoScript -- XSS attacks are very common, and malicious js is not just limited to obscure corners of the web. Even big sites get compromised sometimes.

TeeCee

How fast? 

Joke

"....quick-moving attack targeting Google Orkut....."

Ok, exactly how long did it take to affect *both* users?

Anonymous Coward

NoScript Does Work 

Paris Hilton

And frankly anyone not using NoScript, AdBlock Plus and Adblock Filterset.G Updater is a bit stupid. And anyone not capable of or getting annoyed over operating NoScript shouldn't be let anywhere near a computer.

Matthew Joyce

Top marks 

Thumb Up

Three hours after publishing? Whether or not Facebook is of any value, well done El Reg!

Named and shamed...

Leo Davidson

NoScript: The cure is worse than the disease. 

Thumb Down

I tried using NoScript. I love the idea of it in principal. Unfortunately half an hour of using it will made me realise how much of the web depends on Javascript. The majority of sites I visited were completely broken and I have to keep whitelisting things to the point that it seemed utterly pointless.

If pretty much breaking the entire Internet is your idea of a fix then I'd rather be broken. Here's a similar fix: Turn off your computer.

I went back to using Flashblock instead.

I'd love it if Javascript wasn't used so (IMO) gratuitously. (It's used wonderfully on many sites but on others, where you're being served a static page, it makes me wonder WTF the site authors were thinking.) If I only had to whitelist a few sites, like I do with Flashblock, then NoScript would be great. Having to whitelist a huge number of sites is a giant hassle and makes me question what I'm protecting myself from when so many things are granted an exception.

Jim Carter

@ James O'Brien 

Coat

No mate, you're not. So, this coat rack is starting to look bare...

Farai

I reckon... 

Paris Hilton

the Facebook engineers were busy sitting reading The Register rather than checking their mailboxes - who would argue based on clear evidence?!?

Paris, because she keeps her eyes on the right kinda ball!

Anonymous Coward

Patched? 

Thumb Down

Examples work for me...

Giorgio Maone

NoScript's Anti-XSS protection, James 

Stop

@James Roper:

Please RTFM, before posting misinformed comments: http://noscript.net/features#xss

Aaron

'Within three hours of posting this story...' 

more like REDfacebook amirite

Dave

@Ropata 

Thumb Down

Care to bet your life on that?

NoScript is more of a pain than a saviour, not least because of the false sense of security that its users have.

Pierre

Examples don't work here... 

... and it's without NoScript.

Moddy

@Pierre 

Go

Perhap you should RTFA and note they were closed within 3 hours of this article being posted?

Top article.

Jason DePriest

bad advice 

Boffin

Hey AC, Adblock Filterset.G does not work with AdBlock Plus and, in fact, the AdBlock Plus folks tell you not to install it if you have AdBlock Plus (http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g).

I wonder if Firekeeper would catch it... it picks up some other attacks.

Pete "oranges" B.

I told ja, I told ja! 

Flame

No gosh-dern good would come 'a these whipper-snappers and their gosh derned Web 2.0!