So what
exactly was on there that the IWF didn't like?
The UK government's resilience website is itself far from resilient. Attempts to fill out the feedback form consistently return an ironic runtime error page (screenshot here). The error message reades in part: "An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the …
And everything to do with either bad application configuration or (more likely, considering the questionnaire is presented to the user before the error occurs) bad application programming. Considering for a moment that resilience is the provision of standby or failover capability in the event of server or site failure, bad configurations and/or programming is not something that would be considered. Moreover if the application was badly written, that same application would be made available at any resilience/disaster recovery site and would present exactly the same issues. So, as you see, nothing whatsoever to do with resilience and thereby cancelling out any sense of irony the author feels.
Agree with glennog. It is very likely it was probably a configuration error. If the form is sent via SMTP it could incorrect mail server configuration.
They must have repaired whatever the problem was. It can't be that bad cosidering the PM's site can't even have an email form. http://www.number10.gov.uk/footer/contact-us
Something to add to the list of illnesses and viruses (viri).
Clearly some scriptkiddie graduated from VBasic to '.NET' and bypassed the need for a formal training or understanding of coding practice.
"Oooooohhh look, I can make wizard dance in Office 2003. Now me export as HTM, cos I iz da bom!"