Pop it as a ps3 background thingy #
Posted Tuesday 9th December 2008 13:42 GMT
I'll help do some testing.
Posted Tuesday 9th December 2008 13:42 GMT
I'll help do some testing.
Posted Tuesday 9th December 2008 13:42 GMT
not only do they take my tax money, my beer, my time when explaining the real world to graduates, but they want my CPU cycles as well? naff off!
go and get nvidia to sponser a CUDA ladboritory or something.
Posted Tuesday 9th December 2008 13:42 GMT
lets be clear about this, we average users dont care about massive fields of solar or wind or water plan/
all we relly want is something simple small and easy to plug into our 12v kit in house and outside.
somthing as simple as a kids windmill atached to a tiny 12v dynamo at a £1 a go, linked to many more that you can buy down your local market place, a small self contained £10 water powered catlitic 12v fuelcell that again can take this new universal 12v connector, and finally a few £5 12v PVs to add in this one single garden corner mini pawer plan that connectes universally to the battery outlet in your average underused UK outhouse.
a total 10 100watt or more that you can run your mini PCs and LCD monitors off in the house is all i need or want right now, but we cant get these mini self contained units or the generic universal conectors that make pluging all this together real easy, and growable week on week as you buy more units to suit your space......
Posted Tuesday 9th December 2008 18:40 GMT
If these things are going to be that easy, why not "wallpaper" your roof instead? Leave the desert to us MX'ers and turtles.
Posted Wednesday 10th December 2008 01:42 GMT
I'll give you two sticks to rub together... might that be simple enough?
Posted Wednesday 10th December 2008 23:36 GMT
"But using a conventional supercomputer (with a few teraflops of computing power, presumably) would take 100 days to virtually test an organic molecule for its suitableness for the flexible solar cell.
Harvard wants to look at tens of thousands of molecules and at the scale of supercomputer that the university can bring to bear, this would require 22 years of computation. That is not going to fix our energy problem."
<pedant>
Either your math is terrible, or the supercomputer referred to in the first quoted paragraph is vastly inferior to what Harvard can actually bring to bear, as mentioned in the second paragraph.
For the sake of laziness let's use a nice even 10,000 compounds multiplied by those 100 days of computation each compound requires; this gives us one million days of computation, which when divided by 365.23 leaves us with 2738 years and about 6 hours, 15 minutes.
</pedant>