Cue the "no nukes" wingnuts, who have absolutely no idea how many grams of radioactive material is naturally present in a cubic mile of sea water, much less how many grams of radioactive material may or may not have been lost in the accident, much less how easily said material is likely to dissolve in seawater ...

we can expect the ice-sheet that contains the nuke (or at least the expensive bits from it) to melt away.

Not so much a "broken arrow" more like a melting icicle?

This is just one of the many weapons lost during the 60s and 70s, not all of which where recovered. It was believed at the time that some may have fallen into unfriendly hands but as usual this was more speculation than hard fact.

..for one welcome our nuke-wielding, high-yielding polarbear / penguin overlords/terrorists.

>ice caps melting- rouge nukes

New from Max Factor...

mmm. If the lensing explosives went off I doubt there'd be sod all of the nuke core left behind but dust. Even the term "without setting off the nuclear explosives" is dubious, as such an explosion can occur at a very low yield; not kilotons or tons but even sub-tons (which would probably just have gassified the core and spread it wider), but I guess they'd have had physical interlocks to prevent even that.

I'm no expert.

@jake:

grams of radioactive material in seawater - lots, but it's diluted. I will eat many kilos of salt over time. Just not all today.

How much radioactivity lost - Let's ask them, shall we? Given the huge importance of this event I'm sure they'll have best-guess records which they want open.

Solubility of material, well, there's wiki if you want to look. I recall an natural uranium reactor, oklo in Gabon, which ran for several hundred thousand years with water running through it. I guess not very soluble then. Probably less so in cold conditions.

Perhaps you can help us wingnuts with some researched facts rather than spouting off with questions? Questions are after all the easy bit.

"the isreali's supposedly have lost 1 as well"

Isn't that just a plot device for The Sum of all Fears?

It's highly unlikely that the radioactivity in seawater is being produced by a weapons grade fissile material.

But I take your point, coal fired power stations is my current favourite.

I think you're referring to the Montgomery <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery>. I hope you are because one of these is bad enough, a 2nd... would be twice as bad I suppose.

I've never heard the nuke-aboard rumour. Likely is cobblers.

According to wiki, it's got phosphorous and mustard gas bombs and "...3,173 tons of munitions containing 1,400 tons of TNT remain on the wreck". Tasty mix.

Am puzzled though - why did it have mustard gas, I thought this was convened illegal quite a while before the M sank.

http://www.web.net/~cnanw/a3.htm

the numbers of actuall weapons is a bit ridiculus , most nukes lost by the U.S have been from airborne sources.

@AC

Things you must remember during the cold war tons of aircraft flew with live nukes onboard and SOP for an aircraft in trouble is to shed it's load before attempting to land no matter if it is nuclear or conventional weapons, the number of Nukes dropped where 59 IIRC and 12 ( lying in the oceans for the most part) not recovered add this to the navy's 8 missing nukes and we have 20 ok so sue me for the other 2 and as the scorpian was not on shakedown cruises , and overseas so it would have been armed just as the thresher was .

@SHAJE

Ye the whole last bit was meant ot be tounge and cheek.

And broken arrow means " damaged nuclear weapon as in leaking radiation" not lost

and even we brits have lost quite a few mostly in the falklands , frigates like shiny shef and conventry carried tatical nuclear weapons for anti sub work by helicopters and the is the main reason why the shefields burnt out hulk was scuttled rather brought back under tow to bligthy as the tatical nukes where damaged in the attack.

What defines lost is the point here. the Armed forces of the west only really say they loose nukes when one is lost in the system if a vessel with weapons on board goes missing they only register the craft as missing and not he contents.

With regards to the Dichoroethyl Sulphide (Mustard Gas) issue, the United States at the time, were not signatories to the Geneva Convention restricting the use of Chemical Weapons...

As such, the U.S Army Chemical Corp were responsible, at the time, for the transportation of U.S Chemical weapons, most notably, mortar bombs for the 4.7inch "Goon Gun" Mortar...

Said rounds were reportedly transported near to the battlefield, ready for use...

However, as the knowledge of the "Goon Gun", & it's related ordanance was classified, most U.S Army personell did'nt know of this weapons existance...

The result, of this policy, was reportedly 1000 U.S servicemen were either killed, or very badly wounded as a result of the Bari Incident, in which a Luftwaffe air raid on Bari Harbour, in response to a somewhat bombastic radio speech, by a high ranking Allied Officer caused the cargo of a U.S freighter, which included Goon Gun rounds, to "cook off", causing mustard gas to enter the sea & air...

Alexander's claim of 22 unrecovered weapons is probably a little on the low side as that is simply the number estimated from currently available sources.

ROFLMAO