I thought that current trauma-treatment advice was not to use tourniquet due to the increased likelihood of limb damage turning into limb loss due to tissue death below the tourniquet. I suppose it's a sliding scale: if direct pressure won't cut it, and they'll die without it, pull the ripcord.

I can but repeat the title in confusion.

When did the military start using "suite jackets" and when did they start deploying "cuff buttons".

Has anybody warned the ex-communist block of this dangerous military escallation?

For goodness sake, whist flailing ones arms (for example beating off a bee/wasp/Russell Brand) in a public place you could possibly "have somebodys eye out" with a "cuff button".

Surely the metropolitan police (shoot em in the head, shoot them till their dead) should be made aware immediatly, Jackie Smith may need to have them banned imediatly as terrorist weapons of mass destruction.

The advice was:

"No matter how severe the head injury is, NEVER apply a tourniquet around the neck".

This is a genius design, and props should be given.

Count 1: Just coz "sleeve buttons history" googles to H2G2 don't make it true. It could all be folk garbage, but the snotty nose bit is accepted wisdom. Fredrick the Great gets more credit in the 18th C. More likely an aristo would want to do this than a revolutionary?

Count 2: Tampons might be good in bullet wounds (assuming they are from a decent calibre), sanitary towels are more general purpose. Did you ever get to look inside a field dressing while you wore a black suit & white cap?

Mine's the one with no buttons and nasty looking sleeves please

is short for "The War Against Terror"

Why?

I don't know. Maybe its something to do with the tampon reference but I too would ilke clarification.

I'd just like to say that my lunch today consists of a Twix and a bottle of water. This is a new low for me.

As you said, advice for non-amputating injuries is to NOT apply a tourniquet for the reasons you state.

However in a combat situation when a femoral artery gets ruptured you're faced with two choices

1) Apply tourniquet to stop or slow the bleeding and run the risk of losing the limb

2) Bleed out VERY quickly and DIE.

Not much of a choice really?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll let the IT angle go cos it's giving us Information about new battlefield Technology

Y'know, putting "Um...why not" before a complex request doesn't make it any easier. Body armour...um, why not just push for world peace. Duh. It's one, affordable solution to a problem. Others will come along with the right technology.

I don't know what the definition of "twat" is over there in the empire, but over here in the colonies....*blush*

>"When an ITS-clad trooper, in the course of putting foot to ass for his country, "

Geeze, shouldn't they maybe kit the poor buggers out with a pair of boots first?

Have you forgotten about The War Against Terror already?

You obviously need to spend some time in a re-education camp.

That sort of armour (note the u 'merikans!) you speak about is the dream of the military but a soft flexible armour capable of deflecting even handguns is some way off.

And special forces tend not wear armour at all when on advanced operations as its often quite restrictive.

I hope it works as it seems a good idea in theory at least.

"TWAT .....is short for "The War Against Terror"" ... By [Boffin] Jon Posted Wednesday 29th October 2008 13:06 GMT

Any advance on ...."That War Arousing Terror"?

Thanks for that. I've just had a mental picture of a grunt in the supermarket asking some puzzled shelf-stacker where the 7.62mm tampons are......

The Vietnamese used to tie cord round their limb joints before they went to fight against the US forces in order to have ready tourniquets when they needed them.

It's good to see it's only taken the US 45 years to catch up.

I'll get me tourney coat.

TWAT = The War Against Terror

I should've got that.

I need a holiday.

"That sort of armour (note the u 'merikans!) you speak about is the dream of the military but a soft flexible armour capable of deflecting even handguns is some way off."

An excellent point, and I'll even go further with it. The current Interceptor vest with shatter-plate inserts is ridiculously heavy and restricting. It's capable of stopping 7.62mm rounds from an AK-47, but only because of those ceramic inserts (or the shot was at a shallow angle). Having ceramic plates to cover the thigh's could prevent some of these injuries, but it's going to slow down soldiers even further.

Having worn the Interceptor in the sandbox during the four hottest months of the year I can say this. We were required to wear those vests, but most of the time to trade out protection for mobility we detached the groin and neck protection as well as removing the ceramic plates in the torso piece. (even thought we were frequently ordered not to) It gets ridiculously hot there where a 48 C day would be a cool blessing, so adding more insulation doesn't seem overly appealing to me. I shall shush now.

... is the treatment of a wound by putting a plug into it. I'll stop there before it gets messy.

David,

Thanks for giving me an unpleasant mental image with the Beating Off Russell Brand comment. I really needed that.

Paris, well......

You might be thinking of Richard Davis of the Second Chance body armo(u)r company.

I wore body-armor with ceramic plates front and back over there for a year - and we all carried tampons and maxi-pads apart from the Israeli trauma bandages we were issued. Handy things, those tampons - super-absorbent and plugs the hole, staunching blood-loss and helping to maintain blood-pressure.

Paris, because she's a bleedin' twat.

Your lunch sounds yummy.

I think I'll stick with the bottled water though. Working in London means there's a good chance the tap water has passed through several politicians already.

That thought alone is enough to bring my Twix up.

Where's the 'I had a crap lunch and metioned it in the comments section of the Register' icon?

My caving first aid kit that I always carry underground comprises of a small roll of Gaffa tape with 3 tampons inserted into its centre. Gaffa tape as it's the only thing that seems to stick in the damp and there is enough to tape broken legs together or tape an arm across the chest. And tampons because they are highly absorbent, are round to provide protection around penetrating fractures and provide more pressure as they soak up blood and expand. I don't suggest using these techniques at home, but then an ambulance will be with you in less than 20 minutes. Underground it could be more than 5 hours before my Cave Rescue collegues could reach me, so the priorities are very different.

The history bit I learned over here in the ex-colonies was that Queen Liz the 1st disliked her soldiers with snotty sleeves, and so ordered the attachment of buttons in order to rub one's nose the wrong way, painfully.

Of course, a properly restrictive cuff might serve to act as a tourniquet for hand injuries, so maybe they were ahead of the times?

Pengy, for simplicity's sake!

I really dont know whats wrong with all of these special forces types, there so far behind the game. All they need is the magic spray that our soccer players all use!

You've all seen our poor, tough and certainly not overpaid soccer goliaths taken down by a malicious and hugely injuring slide tackle. They roll around on the ground in agony and then comes the magic spray and suddenly there fine to carry on! Surely that's all the special forces need, lots and lots of magic spray! Im sure it would work even better then a torniquet!

King Arthur: Look, you stupid Bastard. You've got no arms left.

Black Knight: Yes I have.

King Arthur: *Look*!

Black Knight: It's just a flesh wound.

I think the French wore brown trousers also "bit of camaflogue"

"you'll seem less of a pillock"

Thus spaketh another anonymoose pillock!

Think Alex was being slightly sarcastic.. but then you do need a high form of intelligence to understand sarcasm...

@Alex: It's still not possible, but the ideas are there.

Anon, because they are drawing in...!

I'd demand a string every inch, so as to choose up to where to save my body and which part to abandon to vultures & surgeons.

On the other hand, I see the reverse scenario in close combat [probably involving JC van Damme]: evil seal-with-tourniquet appears, fisticuffs ensues, and smart cookie [JC] just stops bloodflow to a handful of baddie's limbs.

This goes fine with the usual hardman-antisafteytech sentiment; see also e.g.: USA circuit racing with big champion opposing the restricting anti-whiplash seatbelt. Until said champion snuffs it in exactly the type of crash this belt would have saved him in.

... that no one thought to add a tactical to that achronym

ITS-T or something

second thoughts doesn't work, still might save some confusion in the heat of battle

"quick i've been shot...pull on my ITS! "

/coat/pocket/carry on DVD's

The prank potential is mind-boggling.

I can just imagine it. Just go for the pockets and pull their tourniquets and watch as they all start waddling around and become incapacitated.

Maybe instead of guns the enemy can use coat hangers on the end of a long piece of wire and fish the tourniquet string out. And god help the marines if they brush past something and accidentally pull it themselves by getting caught on something through their trousers

When I was an Ambulance boy several decades ago , the reasoning was that a Tourniquet should only be used when direct pressure to the wound was ineffective . The Tourniquet would mean the loss of the limb, but the live may be saved.

As usual you have to use common sense when treating wounds.