Paris might bid.

In it Moller was touting the virtues of personal flying saucers again and there was the same 20-year-old grainy film of a 10 second flight. Strangely enough not a mention was made of SEC's ruling nor of the fuel problems.

Alien because I also have a grainy hand held film of a flying saucer that no one believes.

i was looking for a wire holding the saucer up in that video, but it looked quite convincing to me, i know you say he's been develloping it for a long time, but he's still got the best (only?) flying saucer/car about hasn't he?

does this not even warrant cautious optimism?

...due to insurance company demands, said Moller at the time.

"I am NOT on a wire, I am FLYING!" --Graham Chapman.

The auctions only question and answer is all that really needs to be said:

Q: In your information, it does not say if the unit still works - does it? Oct-06-08

A: We do not recommend flying the M200X in its current configuration. The fans are currently fitted with aluminum blades with a known failure mode that would put the operator at risk. We have switched over to composite fan blades and would only recommend flights be undertaken in the M200X if this was done as well. Unfortunately we believe this would also reduce the historic value of the aircraft. Performance estimates for the M200X are available but it should be considered non-operational at this time.

This con artist is going to make 20K from this piece of junk and he can't even provide said piece of junk in working order.... in fact to make things worse he even tells you its going to fail! Some poor sap is going to have this delivered to his door jump in it and be extremely disappointed!!

Come on, it's been over 12 hours.

"I want my flying car".

And this isn't it. What "it" is rhymes with "it".

"now, anyone seen an auction for a flying submarine?"

YEP ! - Well seen the plans for it anyways

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/06/darpa_submersible_aeroplane_plan/

lol /coat