@A/C Frank Butcher #
Posted Friday 26th September 2008 15:21 GMT
That'll confuse dem dare yanks....
Posted Friday 26th September 2008 14:30 GMT
Is it just me, or does he look like Frank Butcher? No wonder the IRS are interested in him!
Posted Friday 26th September 2008 19:09 GMT
And the rich stay richer by NOT PAYING TAXES because of all the loopholes written into the laws JUST FOR THEM by their friends in congress. I'm sure it doesn't hurt that he and his cronies probably ponied up several hundreds of quid for various officeholders and party officials.
Getting my coat. That'll about cover it.
Posted Friday 26th September 2008 22:09 GMT
Rich people don't pay tax, that's what poor people are for. He must have pissed off someone with even more cash them him.
Posted Friday 26th September 2008 22:54 GMT
Have you met any of the EMC royal family?
Nice they're not.
Posted Saturday 27th September 2008 03:14 GMT
Have you any idea how much gin Pat drinks of a weekend? VAT on the slate as Arthur would say.
Posted Saturday 27th September 2008 06:08 GMT
Those in the top 1% of income pay 40% of the income tax revenue in the U.S., so I think they are already pretty well fleeced, even though I'm not among them.
Posted Monday 29th September 2008 09:38 GMT
Good luck with that. If Bin laden owed the IRS money , he would of been found with in three days of going into Afghanistan
Posted Monday 29th September 2008 09:43 GMT
Seriously, this is just petty. He's worth $1.4 bil, and he's complaining over a $62 million tax? Fuck. And the "my accountants told me it was OK" defense is NOT going to fly. This actually happens fairly often here, accountants will try the craziest shell-games to avoid as many taxes as possible (for their clients); if it works the rich guy gets richer. If not, they're SUPPOSED to suck it up and pay.
@Tim
"Those in the top 1% of income pay 40% of the income tax revenue in the U.S.,"
But I just wikipedia'd it, and the top 1% make 15% of the US income. And, at that, the top 1% starts at about $250,000/year... I'm wondering what the top 0.5% or top 0.1% make? I'm guessing the guys at $250,000 are not quite high enough to get into the serious tax dodges (and pay a lot of that 40%) while those making millions get out at quite a low tax rate.
Posted Monday 29th September 2008 10:37 GMT
Not if the top1% are earning 60% of the money. Paying 40% of the tax in that case means that the poorest 99% are earning 40% of the money and paying 60% of the tax.
Soaked in gin, more like...
Posted Monday 29th September 2008 20:17 GMT
than not the richest ones also have access to all the best tax dodges and really aren't paying a dime. Just like corporations whinge about their taxes but you don't see them whinging about all the special tax writeoffs they get....where's the fun in that?
Paris, 'cuz even she knows the dodges.