In case you've been living under a rock on some distant planet, NASA apologizes for the intrusion. Image courtesy of NASA The Phoenix Mars Lander has completed the tricky task of nudging aside a Martian rock roughly the size and shape of a VHS tape so that curious Earthling scientists could peer underneath. The lander's …
I for one...
...welcome our new rock-moving overlords.
If only I could retrieve that rock and put in on eBay.
It must be worth millions after all the effort and $ that has gone into shifting it.
Alien icon, they probably work cheaper.
Automated remote rock shifting
Somehow it doesn't quite capture the imagination as much as the paradigm shifting "One small step for man. One giant leap for mankind" speech made many moons ago.
Sure it can move rocks...
...but will it blend?
Seriously though, when you think about it, the remote robitcs teams at NASA are pretty amazing. Not only do they deisgn rovers that keep going...and going...and going...(how far past the design life?)...but they also keep finding new and interesting ways to take thier toys and make them do something unforseen, but, (to them, and geeks of their ken,) pretty damn cool too.
You may not think moving a rock around is a big feat, but pre-programming it into a robot as "mission specific" as the Lander, and then having it accomplish the task with a minimum of soil disturbance using a tool on the bot not designed for moving rocks is pretty cool. It takes me a few days to change my robot arm's path to manipulate a slightly larger piece of paper, and I can try, re-try, and do it all over again. These folks coded it up in no time and sent it out with the Lander's morning dailies.
Somewhere at NASA, there is a coder who actually deserves his salary.
Mines the one with the "robots for utter idiots" in the pocket.
Lies, all lies.
We are not being told the truth! This is clearly the footprint of a lager swilling alien, if you look carefully , you can see where there are one or two drip marks in the sand where he has spilt some special brew. I have looked under a lot of stones and this is not what it normally looks like.
We should be told the truth.
We built this Mars colony....
...on Rock 'n' Roll!
Mine's the one with the airguitar over the shoulder
Headless robotic exploration
Waste a day to move a pebble by 40cm. That cost how much? A hundred k, a million?
The so-called "robotic exploration" is so frustratingly useless and inefficient it just defies belief. A clear case of false economy - spending a lot of money in bite-size bits over many years for no return instead of spending it all at once for a manned mission and getting the necessary answers.
Faith can move mountains,
science can only move small rocks.
But referential humorists can move coats.
Surly the Imperial Betamax is the standard El Reg unit for measuring martian rocks
Just a thought...
...but now NASA are getting into (rock) gardening, can we send Alan Titmarsh and the rest of the TV gardeners to show them how it *should* be done? And since they will all need somewhere to live, we can send Linda Barker and the rest of the interior design crowd too...
Just make sure they leave Kim and Aggi behind to clean the telephones...
Billions of Dollars and ....
What command did they execute "DRAG_AND_MAKE_PENIS_SHAPE"!
We moved a rock!!! Yay!
wow, arent robots wonderful
I cant help but be serioulsy underwhelmed by this amazing feat. This is why it might be nice to have a person there ... just pick the rock up and throw the bloody thing away - job done. Chose Paris for the VHS angle ... and comparable manual labour ability.
Yet another job outsourced
A Martian could have done that job in a fraction of the time, yet here's NASA remotely outsourcing it to some bloke on a phone line on the other side of the solar-system!
When you want a rock moving, you want a local person with local knowledge, not some alien who can barely speak the language in some cost-cutting, sweat-shop call-centre on Earth.
I love Nasa
Cash starved government bureaucracy. How many years of work and they still can't make a good margareta.
Mines the one with the igloo on the back
*blinks in the light*
Where'd my roof go?
Is there anything these rovers can't do? :-D
Nice hole you have there.
uummm .. wha?
huh? moving a small rock is now news?
Maybe thats where MS left the source code that explains how the Office file formats work?
That would make it darker.
Re: Headless robotic exploration
"The so-called "robotic exploration" is so frustratingly useless and inefficient it just defies belief."
And sending up a shedload of life-support equipment just so people can float around in space is more efficient, is it? And to sustain explorers on Mars you'd need a "shedload squared" of that equipment unless you were thinking of running a suicide (or flag/dick-waving) mission.
"A clear case of false economy - spending a lot of money in bite-size bits over many years for no return instead of spending it all at once for a manned mission and getting the necessary answers."
Well, you have to prioritise your funding somehow, and I think that the various probes to different planets and their satellites have done a pretty decent job, often doing stuff that you wouldn't send humans to do, anyway.
In any case, the biggest bite of them all has nothing to do with the robotic missions. The blame lies with everyone who funded stuff like the ISS and the space shuttle in preference to stuff which maximises the scientific payload.
just what we get from showing that universe is the huge and sub-atomic space is tiny. SHOW ME THE PATENTS. show me the benefit to anyone who isn't on a grant. Make me a better (off) person. you PhDtards. I'm paying for this crap.
Woah, I've calmed down now. No I haven't. SHOW ME THE BENEFITS NOW!
"mars lander shows rock who's boss"
This has got to be one of the best headlines I've read about the Mars lander.
So spending money now to get soil/ice/CO2 samples, surveys and environmental tests using expendable, hardware is "frustratingly useless"? y'idiot, the US can't even launch the space shuttle without having another one on standby 'just in case', they can't even go back to the moon, do you have any idea of the scale involved sending a person to Mars? Even if it was possible, let alone affordable, anything went wrong, and all your eggs, being in one basket would be a omlettey mush, doing stuff now in space much cheaper, giving results now is far more sensible than some pie (biodome) in the sky (space) idea that wouldn't get of the ground (launch) for decades. Crawl back under your rock and stay there until my robot arm comes and gets you......
- Ex-Soviet engines fingered after Antares ROCKET launch BLAST
- Hate the BlackBerry Z10 and Passport? How about this dusty old flashback instead?
- NASA: Spacecraft crash site FOUND ON MOON RIM
- Google's Mr Roboto Andy Rubin bids sayonara to Chocolate Factory
- Review Pixel mania: Apple 27-inch iMac with 5K Retina display