VIdeo. #
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 08:22 GMT
Watch that one folks, it's truly superb.
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
Enjoy (T)alk (L)ike (A) (R)obot (D)ay = T.L.A.R.D.
2nd annual T.L.A.R.D. - 10/10/08 - 10:10:10am - 10:10:10pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa7mDkmWvyw
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
"...two uninhabited aircraft will now mate with one another in flight."
Surely that's "uninhibited", yes?
I, for one, welcome our new flying sex-droid overlords.
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
I for one welcome our autonomous flying probulating overlords.
Paris, because I bet she'd like an automated probe.
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
>They will steer themselves in on final approach by tracking a glowing infrared ring on the offered receptacle
And so will the missile with the IR tracking head?
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
Surely giving machines--with the capability of killing people--the ability to procreate is yet another step closer to Armageddon...
Paris because...well...you know...
Posted Thursday 18th September 2008 23:36 GMT
Velcro-tipped condoms for coupling a drunk with a fat bird.
We've all done it.
Right, where's me pint...
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 08:22 GMT
... to completely automating most "dumb operator" actions in the military, even the ones that require "skill". Computers and robots can do it faster and better - as long as all necessary sensor data can be quickly captured, decisions can be coded in a lookup table or desribed by an algorithm, and there is a basic stimulus-response relationship.
Hmmm. So, I wonder how long it will be before Navy Warfare Officers are relaced by computers, then ....
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 08:22 GMT
Hmm, if there are six-foot robots flying around programmed to shove probes into hot rings, I think I'll lay off the curry for a while.
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 08:22 GMT
Pretty humdrum, if you ask me. Just pop it in, pump quickly, disengage, and fly off. What is the world coming to?
Paris because, well, you can probably guess...
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 08:22 GMT
Did anyone else notice that the "tanker" in the concept video looked identical to the docking vehicle apart from the fact it had no obvious means of propulsion. Possibly because that craft has a rear prop, and they didn't want to draw attention to the fact that they were planning on trying to stick a fuel nozzle into a basket mere inches from a whirling prop.
Sounds like fun :)
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 09:28 GMT
Robots coupling in mid-air? Is this the new Transformers film? Will there be a Playmobile diorama of them shagging over a New York skyline while Maximus Prime rages and destroys all before him 'cos some one has nicked his bird?
Waiting for a suitable Twat-O-Tron '"I'm burning all my son's Transformer toys to stop him re-enacting the scene." comment. (yeah, but at least it's not this cross-species sex like in Barbarella)
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 11:56 GMT
Now all we need them to do is teach them to extract and refine the oil without our help and they won't need us any more! (well, until they break down)
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 11:56 GMT
...until they install the R2 unit.
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 11:56 GMT
So they've automated willy-waving then?
Paris, automatically.
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 12:08 GMT
If you're looking for an analogy, it'll be the aerial equivalent of a St Bernard (the tanker) trying to be shagged by a particularly vicious terrier (the fighter/weapon), in a bob-sleigh.
Isn't true (robotic) love great?
Posted Friday 19th September 2008 15:52 GMT
Maybe they could call it Radar Love?