Goldfish customers sent wrong bills
dervheid
It's a well known fact... #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 14:02 GMT

that the Goldfish is a creature of extremely limited brain function, and piss-poor memory.
Minor errors of this nature must be expected when conducting complicated financial arrangements with a Goldfish. You can't expect it to remember everything, can you.
Anonymous Coward
I'm sure that... #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 14:45 GMT

...this has got absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Goldfish recently served notice on the company that do their statement printing
Gordon Pryra
how many times have we heard this trite statement? #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 14:45 GMT
"protection of customer data is extremely important to us and we are treating this very seriously"
If you were taking this seriously at all, you owuld offer thsoe affected a one off payment of 10% of their bill as a refund.
A letter to say sorry? that really makes things better........
Anonymous Coward
@dervheid #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 14:46 GMT

Oooo. Look there's a castle!
.
.
+2 seconds
.
.
Where did that castle come from?
.
.
I must be a goldfish - can't remember Jasper Carrott sketches verbatim...
Anonymous Coward
@Gordon Pryra #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 15:45 GMT
If you were taking this seriously at all, you owuld lern to tpye proprly.
Michael O'Malley
Goldfish prejudice #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 17:01 GMT
I think it is shocking that people are using this human error as an excuse to flaunt auropiscean prejudices.
Recent studies show that goldfish have quite good memories. The forgetful humans who failed to print these statements correctly have demeaned the name of goldfish.
I demand an apology.
Anonymous Coward
Goldfish Snacks... #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 20:56 GMT

First I thought this article was about Goldfish snacks: www.pfgoldfish.com
I think I'll go out and grab a bag.
Here's something about goldfish for your peepers: http://www.dailyhaha.com/_pics/goldfish_bra.htm
Anonymous John
What do you get if you cross an elephant with a goldfish? #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 20:56 GMT
Aimee
So.. #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 20:56 GMT
we are expected to believe that the 'printers' have access to the billing database, and managed to mix up the billing information, hum
ElFatbob
Meanwhile... #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 22:05 GMT
i'd like to know what, if any, Data Privacy statutes were broken (optimistic i know - DP means fck all in this country now) and who's going to get it up the ronson for this...
oh that's right, i forgot the 'This act means fck all' clause in the DPA.
Anonymous Coward
Bloody annoying ... #
Posted Tuesday 19th August 2008 22:05 GMT

... I'm a Goldfish customer and was hit by this issue. It took me a while to work out what the problem was, and having gone through my recent transactions and compared them with the statement I finally worked it out. I looked at Goldfish's website and saw no mention of the problem. I could see my online statement which was correct, so I was sure it was just a problem with their paper statement. So I called Goldfish and was then told that they knew about it. I was - rightly I think - a little upset that they had therefore wasted my time and my money (on their 0870 phone line), but of course when I mentioned something about refunding the cost of the call their "customer service" rep told me I knew the cost of the call before I made it and the longer I talked the more I was costing myself! Unbelievable! I did suggest that they could have put a notice on goldfish.com, rather than taking several days to send me a letter and a new statement, which he said they would "consider". Since they've been bought by Barclaycard and aren't offering new cards, I doubt they could care less ...
Andy Tunnah
@Gordon - get a life! #
Posted Wednesday 20th August 2008 12:27 GMT
its people like you who are causing this society to end up like the litigious shithole that is now the USA
why should anyone get 10% off their bill simply for having the wrong one sent to them ? did it cost em that much ? does it warrant that much personal damages ?
meh really gets my back up these sort of statements