Aww #
Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:52 GMT
And here was me expecting some Moon-dirt digging style robot wars.....
Posted Monday 28th July 2008 15:52 GMT
And here was me expecting some Moon-dirt digging style robot wars.....
Posted Monday 28th July 2008 17:11 GMT
is digging deep into amanfrommars...
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 01:22 GMT
could just have
A hydralic drill with a hoover through the core, and a senor on the rotor to control the power/force of the hydralic/drill
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 08:21 GMT
If rather than building materials for moon towns complete with moon town halls and charity shops etc.. and for oxygen production what NASA are really thinking is this could used alongside robotic return vehicles to harvest large amounts of dust/rock from the moon to bring back to earth. As we all know Moon dust is supposed to be rich in ‘helium 3’ a possible component in future fusion based power generation.
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 09:48 GMT
Since the moon has no atmosphere worth talking about, the Hoover technique would be a non-starter, or perhaps non-sucker.
The temptation for a Paris icon is almost overwhelming...
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 12:37 GMT
> A hydralic drill with a hoover through the core, and a senor
Even if you used one of the old Hoover Seniors, there isn't enough atmosphere to suspend the moondust or cool the motor. Even if there was, the finest particles would escape through the bag, the next particle size up would bung it up, and because the dust is actually pulled through the fan in those old Hoovers, it would end up being choked or damaged by the larger pebbles.
Plus using an upright Hoover would raise the centre of gravity, making the device less stable.
You'd be better off using a Dyson (I'm referring to his wheelbarrow with a ball).
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 14:09 GMT
a air tight system isnt hard to engineer, and theres probaly a particle that exists if you have the money,
once the drill has reached a certain depth you could use air from a tank
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 15:15 GMT
There will be this big hole at the business end where the soil is intended to enter. This will somewhat defeat any attempts at 'air tight'. Let alone the issue of using tanked air - which rapidly escapes to everywhere and only very slightly will increase the pressure returning up the nozzle.
And if it is useless until you dig down a bit, you'll need two devices, so Occam would tend to indicate that this is a way too complicated and unnecessary solution which probably will have extreme minimum success anyway.
Also, why would things be better after you have dug a bit? Do you think you are going to reach air-tight mud?
The horse is definitely dead, I'd stop flogging it if I were you.
Simplicity is crucial...arm...scoop...conveyor...hopper
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 19:27 GMT
From the tank, and surface luner dust would be contaminated from meateor impacts, typical space debris and solar storms
Youd have a purer sample 2m deep
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 19:27 GMT
All one needs to do is reduce the size of a continous miner plant somtimes called a road header I think huge beast that rips the coal out and has at least two arms to rake in the shattered coal on to a convayor belt,or rock as the case may be.
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 20:05 GMT
even if it wasnt a vacuum it would still use the principle artic core samples use
or just use a dirt dog for $129
http://store.irobot.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2475131&cp=2487341&parentPage=family