Posted Friday 25th July 2008 05:44 GMT
Where are all of the data supporting the "Google is an evil search monopoly" theories? I swear I just saw some in another El Reg article. How come Ballmer didn't drag any out to convince his investors that there's a war on? Is he stupid? Does their charting program not function?
Oh ... that's right ... Google is not a monopoly.
Live Search just needs to learn how to not suck.
Angel Bill because you don't have an Angel Ballmer, yet. Besides, even if you did, it would look a lot like the Angel Steve, without the near-invisible glasses ...
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 05:44 GMT
It's a little bit like American cars: throw enough fuel into the engine and eventually they go almost as fast as European ones :)
*runs*
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 05:44 GMT
Is Mr. Ballsup really that incoherent and unimaginative? That explains a lot.
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 05:44 GMT
"If you play poker, you have to meet the main pot to be in the game."
If he knows anything about poker, he should also know to fold when you have a losing hand and you can already see that your opponent has a straight flush.
Paris - Because even she doesn't use MS' search engine.
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 05:44 GMT
In other words he's saying MS are gambling and they're whacking up the stakes because they're losing? Is that wise?
There's no need for Microsoft to gild anything. Half their problems are the multiple layers of cheap gold plating on their underlying turds.
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 10:36 GMT
Why don't they just focus on making a few great things, rather than try to beat everyone else at games they didn't invent but wish they had. watering down their own image in the process.
Once again failing to innovate, but trying to steal the market from those who did.
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 10:38 GMT
It goes something like this:
1. Microsoft attempts to buy Yahoo!
2. Ballmer antes up the... ante.
3. Microsoft attempts to buy Google, the universe.
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 10:38 GMT
"There's no need for Microsoft to gild anything. Half their problems are the multiple layers of cheap gold plating on their underlying turds."
That is without doubt the best analogy of Microsoft I've ever seen. Brilliant!
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 13:24 GMT
Or it goes something like this:
1. MS fail to by Yahoo!
2. Ballmer talks some shit and his chin wobbles. (does it? I hope so. Did you know Gordon Brown has a stylist to teach him how to keep his chin(s) still)
3. ????????
4. NO PROFIT!
Paris' chin doesn't wobble
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 13:48 GMT
"We are going to have to ante up in a significant way to even be in this game. If you play poker, you have to meet the main pot to be in the game."
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 14:43 GMT
"what Ballmer called a "two-horse race" against Google"
Yes, but isn't *Yahoo!* still the second horse in that supposed two-horse race?
With Microsoft being the 3-legged worn-out old nag that's wandering along in the wrong direction and stopping every now and again to leave some more steaming piles of manure on the ground?
Posted Friday 25th July 2008 18:48 GMT
Google's R&D spend for 2007? The first number I found was $2.1B.
Balmer proposes (an increase, we can infer) $1.2 to $1.5B to "remain competitive"?
If I played poker I'd invite Steve *and* the analysts over for a friendly game.
Posted Sunday 27th July 2008 03:58 GMT
"to demonstrate changes in Live Search that add capabilities such as scrolling down an endless page of search results, rather than having to click through to a new page of results" Awesome. Just awesome. Google will be shaking in their shoes...
Posted Monday 28th July 2008 08:52 GMT
<quote>Time to deploy demos to divert and confound financial analysts. Ballmer brought on lower-ranking executives to demonstrate changes in Live Search that add capabilities such as scrolling down an endless page of search results, rather than having to click through to a new page of results as you do with Google, </quote>
OH like Google's Picasa.
Wow, Microsoft are imitators, I mean innovators.
Posted Tuesday 29th July 2008 11:32 GMT
"Ballmer brought on lower-ranking executives to demonstrate changes in Live Search that add capabilities such as scrolling down an endless page of search results"
Brilliant idea, now they can charge all their advertising customers more, as they will be able to display all of their adverts "on the first page of results" !!
Posted Thursday 14th August 2008 19:05 GMT
at least this dreary depressing bitch-fest would draw to a close.
Yeah, i know there are practical problems and annoying little anti-trust issues to overcome, but in the interests of sparing us another emBalmering it has to be a good thing.
Back to the article
