Come one Cameron, give the man a job as minister for civil liberties or some such, surely it's a good idea to let him raise the profile of all the stupidity coming out of uk.gov?

I was quite annoyed with the BBC interview on BBC breakfast this morning. I don't live in his area and I don't much care about what he did or why but the BBC spent the whole interview twisting facts to make his success look like a failure. I know the BBC long ago lost its ability to be impartial but this was above and beyond.

Nothing unusual then.......

Paris because I doubt she could suck as much as the interview did this morning.

As someone who abhors the ID database project and the undermining of habeas corpus in our desperate War on Terror, I should be in the cheering section for Davis, but instead I see him as a hypocrite and a phoney.

He knew he would be back in the Commons - he couldn't lose this election. He tried to tell voters in his constituency to vote on a single issue, despite that fact that they were electing an MP, not choosing an option in a referendum. He halved the turnout and - despite having no credible opposition - reduced his own vote by 25%. And he now has the audacity to claim that he has achieved a "spectacular" and "stunning" win as he shuffles into political oblivion.

We need champions to stand up against this ID database madness - but please, let they be credible ones, rather than opportunists and hypocrites. Civil liberties lectures from a man who opposed gay equality at every step of the way? Don't make me laugh.

All Gordo needs to do is decide who's going to run the tombola, and who's going to judge the 'I've got the best voting outfit' competition.

Joke icon? ID cards, 42 days, feeble efforts to entice people to vote... take your pick

Its unclear how many of the other candidates supported the government line on more cctv, dna database, id database, etc - even if they all did (unlikely) I make it about 3:1 against the government line.

Haven't seen this mentioned anywhere yet, hence the helicopter...

Since the real power of democracy in this country is dead, I'm not suprised turnout was low.

I'm not sure how much more of this medicine I can take from the thugs in power, do need some sort of revolution/revolt.

We can do some looting too then :D

How many sincere politicians will get the message and do the same?

Ah, yet, oxymoron.... "sincere politician" ..well, apart from that then?

If the turnout in any election is below 50% then I think that clearly shows that there is no consent to be governed by any of the candidates. Without a turnout of at least 51% then I do not think the winning candidate can really claim a popular mandate. Some have claimed that low turnouts in elections show that the electorate are disillusioned with the electorar process, I think they show that the majority of the electorate do not wish to be governed by any of the candidates. This is the one lesson all parties should take away from low turnouts.

Labour will claim that they would have won had they fielded a candidate. After all a few years back after a kicking in local elections Blair more or less blaimed labour supporters for not voting.

Labour do not seem to believe the polls, they think that the only reason they ever lose an election is that labour voters don't turn out. They really seem to think that evrybody who doesn't vote would vote labour if they actually bothered to turn out. The upshot of this is that they think that by increasing election turnout they will suddenly start winning elections again.

It really is a sad comment that politicians have so enthralled the general public that the tremendous outbreak of apathy is virtually pandemic.

They have only themselves to blame, and as they've surrendered their duties to some unelected committee in Brussels, they only thing they have left to occupy their tiny minds is to perpetuate the trough in which their porcine snouts are generally to be found.

Bring back tumbrils!

> Because that's just the kind of guy I am.

I shall never again look at your piccies in the same way...

Howsabout a week-end in Paris?

Spot on. There is a debate to be had about civil liberties, but this wasn't it. It was a sad piece of attention-seeking from a someone who knows he has been sidelined after losing the leadership.

For the record, I'm ok with 42, as long as it's subject to judicial oversight. As long as it's a Judge who decides whether to grant the extension (and not the Police themselves, or the Home Secretary etc) then I think that's a fair balance between civil liberties and common sense. As always, the devil's in the detail, and it's something that seems to get missed in all the excitement.

"it's just not that likely that anyone else will see it but me or my moderaminion."

you have a moderaminion and do you keep him/her on a leash under your desk?