Freedom of speech - nuff said :) well done that gal :)

Was she the one that admitted blowing "Uncle" Benny regularly and then not getting a share of his estate when man died?

Paris - because even if he is a skanger, she is not an old, haggard, has-been old-man-blowing, money-grubbing skanger.

I think I've applauded this woman before. There she goes again. Fix 'em up good, girl!

Thanks. Now *I've* Got the Benny Hill Music in my head.

complains he's scared of any publicity ? He's in show biz for f^cks sake. All publicity is good publicity as long as it's not shown on YouTube.

Someone else who luv's publicity is Paris

"Is YouTube a legally acceptable place to spout potential libellous abuse at one's spouse?"

Is a video slander or libel? hmmm.... it's verbal like slander but recorded like libel

Regardless, accusations that affect someones reputation or defames character without proof usually can result in financial loss, say bye bye to the £44k also, as Americans are so fond of "unlimited damages" (could this affect his career, social life, sexual function?) possibly everything else could be lost to him and his lawyers too, looks like Central Park may be calling........

Watch the video. Apparently there is no sexual function to affect.

I highly enjoyed that peek into the mind of a crazy gold-digging harlot who thinks she's owed the world for doing fuck-all.

The tarot cards were a nice touch too.

Though as the other half is 74 years of age, isn't this more a case of pensioner abuse, than "spousal abuse"?!

The guy ain't no Jack Nicholson.

>Watch the video. Apparently there is no sexual function to affect.

So, from this, the video indicates (and now you believe?) that he has no sexual function? unless it's actually true, her saying this (and you repeating/paraphrasing, as you didn't use the word "allege", in fact you indicate it's "apparent") could severly affect his quality of life now (as a subject of ridicule) and ability to find a partner in the future, sounds like she could be taken to the cleaners.

I'd get my coat, but that's probably at the cleaners too.

Just whistle the theme from "Mayberry RFD" and that'll get rid of the BH music.

Of course, then you'll have it stuck in your head afterwards.

Is it just me or is there some arcane twist of law wot says if you haven't had sex (as she claims) the marriage is not consumated?

Paris because she's probably done lots of consumation without the marriage bit first.

-- Jon

its not libel or slander if its true, so he better keep that in mind eh?

...be fun to wake up to every morning.

Smiley face because it makes me appreciate my wife even more than I already did.

But were those reputedly horrible things true? Just because they are horrible doesn't make them untrue, and if they are true they aren't slanderous or libelous.

And why does the target of the vitriol think that anyone out here would recognize him next week even if we could recognize his puss now? Seems he is guilty of a bit of puffery and wishfulness that anyone would recognize him next week, never mind today.

In english law if the sex act hasnt been completed between a married couple, the marriage isnt consummated, and can be declared null and void by a judge.

Personally, i believe in that old concept of not washing your dirty laundry in public, a practice that seems to have become unfortunately common these days. Keep it to your self, I dont want to know all the gory details of your matrimonial failures...........

Paris, the archetypical public washer of dirty laundry.

This is the one where she claimed they never had sex isn't it? (I couldn't bare to watch it again).

If that's the case then the marriage can't have been consummated and if that's the case then he can apply for an annulment surely?

Then they were never married and she can't divorce him and so can't get a thing. It's that or admit she told a bare-faced lie to the entire world in order to damage his reputation or cause deliberate hurt.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...

Damn the lot of you. Now *I've* got that stupid tune running round in my head

As they say , you pays for what get and get what you pay for , and ultimately greed for the good life rules amongst all third raters unhappy at going back to their former lifestyle as a nobody !

Yakkety sax ftw.

Hmmm.. on the close-up to the poster of the play what she wrote, "Bonkers", I see heading the cast one Sally Farmiloe. Someone not unknown in the marital controversy stakes herself...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/archer/1437286.stm

(then click on her link)

Could they by any chance be related?

A very rich seam of irony to be mined here, methinks...

(p.s. in case you're wondering I only watched the vid once, Farmiloe's name sprang out as I know someone who knows her - if you catch my drift..)

Her husband is 25 years older than her, and she didn't marry him for his money? Yeah, yeah.

And what does she get out of making a video of her ranting on about her husband...absolutely nothing..other than a bit of revenge, trying to attack him and make him look bad....totally pointless exercise.....has no benefit to her at all. Well, if you ask me, the hubby is far better off without her! Wise move with the pre-nup, he wasn't stupid was he!

That's the problem with women when it comes to divorce..they want your money and they want to destroy you.

The more I think about it, the more I think we should have legalised pre-nups in the UK: it would stop the rediculous divorce cases where the wife can claim half the guys assets and then claim some of his future income ( which even he doesn't know how much that will be) and she claims she helped him develop his business by providing emotional support..that old trusty line, which seems to work every time.

Our laws (UK) need changing fast.

...British Airways

That'll be the police overcoats and the pilot's jacket, please, and there should be *two* items of luggage, if you wouldn't mind...

I think I would keep my equipment all locked up if the rest of her is anything like her mouth. Maybe he found out soon enough to keep his stuff safe and that was in his pre-nup, too.

"I'm also unimpressed by all the comments casting the woman as a gold digger. Do you imagine the guy thinks he'd be just as successful with women if he were making $35K a year?"

I don't see your point. Eh?

Yes, a gold digger. The fact that the guy can't get a woman without paying does not change that, does it?

Its one thing to shout abuse / slander at your spouse / friend / neighbour behind closed doors, but to broadcast it on such a massive medium is just not nice... maybe I'm just too polite.

I agree, free speech, but come on love, get back in the kitchen.