Mum Gail Jordan's amusing plan to celebrate her son's 21st birthday by presenting him with a cake sporting a snap of him as a bare-cheeked bouncing baby came off the rails when Asda staff declared the image "pornographic", the Telegraph reports. Jordan, 41, went to the supermarket chain's branch in Liscard, Wirral to avail …
Just what are Asda saying about their staff
"Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal." What does this say about Asda since they are the ones that find the image pornographic. Is the entire business staffed by paedophiles?
Must be pretty bummed eh :(
Ah well, least it aint put them in the sh...nevermind...
I have a title
"applying a strategically placed star to save his blushes" hes 21, thats the point of it! You get embarressed by your relatives!
...or it didn't happen
Surely with today's laws, she should have been arrested for having a picture of a naked child, put on the Sex Register and classed the dirty pedophile she is
so asda have a rule declaring no nudity. woman tries to get a picture of a naked baby on a cake. so becuase its a baby, its cleary a peado story? no wonder the country has gone peado daft when even el reg is is getting in on the act. This story has nothing to do with child abuse and everything to do with a sensible rule.
shame on you el reg, you are becoming the nets version of the daily mail.....
I can't imagine
Where they put the candle.
Well done, a comment worth reading for once
Wonder what Esther Rantzen would say about this
She was pretty strident on Radio 4 this morning...
Nudity on a birthday cake, bad. Sliting someone's throat on daytime tv, good.
the papers have to put a star over Tory oops Tony Blair? definately an arse if i ever saw one
Are we talking about being able to see his barking spider here or are we talking just cheeks? They have baby's bottoms on the Johnson's ad. Now a nipsy would be a different story.
Has she been a permanent resident of a foreign nation for the past decade?
Yet another victory for zero tollerance jobsworths over common sense and discretion.
ASDA is of course a WalMart company and Walmart is famed as being the store where you can buy a gun but not a video game with a bit of pixelated nudity.
This is clearly a very sensible policy on ASDA's part. There are innumerable documented cases of people spontaneously become paedophiles after only a glimpse of a picture of their own infantile ankle in so called ‘family snaps’.
Surely the issue at stake is considerably wider: more sweeping changes are required. Perhaps a forty eight hour police amnesty should be imposed prior to the introduction of random door to door searches for such inflammatory ‘familial memorabilia’.
A review of all art work is clearly also called for. Botticelli produced some highly provocative cherub’s bottoms in his time. Is there any way his family could be made to pay for his salacious crimes retrospectively? Someone must pay.
They have a no nudity cake policy...
Don't the sell a cake shaped like a pair of boobs? The busty boob cake I believe its called :)
"but there ought to be a place for common sense as well"
nope, that went out with floppy disks and the bbc master....oh and 'horace goes skiing'
Hand Themselves In
The employee whose first thought was 'pornographic' when presented with that picture needs to take themselves and their computer down to the nearest Police Station and hand themselves in, as it's obvious they're not well!
Paris - Cos she gets to have her porno cake and eat it!
Stock on Their Shelves
I do hope that the dilligent staff at ASDA have checked all the baby products on their shelves for more of this offensive material and removed it
Ban those bloody Pampers ads too.. I don't want to see some kids ass on TV.. This is the problem with yoof today. Allow them to show their ass on TV today and they will be robbing you at knife point tomorrow!
UK and common sense
Ofcourse mum could have opted to use a more recent picture and take one on the street, but then would risk being arrested for plotting terrorist acts. I would not be surprised if next week we read the follow-up on this story, where Asda declares it decided to press charges against mum, for insisting on child-pornography being processed by Asda staff, who needless to say, suffer greatly from the whole experience.
(Paris, since she's not bothered with stars on any cake)
Re: red top
I disagree (rather strongly) with your slam of the beloved "El Reg". You could have said it doesn't have anything to do with IT or Paris, which are the prime focus of the site.
BUT, exposing this sort of utter foolishness is quite important. One may argue that this reporting desensitizes people to this horrid abuse of our common sense, but the alternative is to let it go unassailed by public opinion. What REALLY needs to happen is for ALL governments on the entire planet from French town councils (I bet they have them) to the US President to get OUT of the business of legislating morality. Then the market can deal with the idiots at Asda in its own brutally uncompromising way -- ASSUMING it were even necessary at that point. Without the tactile support of the nanny state these moral imperialists would probably crawl back in their hole and go back to beating their children (to make them better people of course).
I am very interested in your goods and / or services and would like to hear more.
"so becuase its a baby, its cleary a peado story?"
The reference is "pornography" not "paedophilia". The cited policy statement (I presume it's that) from SPiT refers to "sexually explicit pictures [...] whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal".
By Asda's reckoning that makes practically every parent in the country a purveyor of filth.
On the other hand, there must be literally millions of photographs of babies in their birthday suits whose sole purpose is to show a cute, lovable child. And to test the mettle of prospective girlfriends/boyfriends of course :-)
Asda needs to get its act together.
Is this the same ASDA ....
that sells The Sun and Daily Star - possibly even the Daily Sport and other wrapped "adult" magazines?
Methinks they doth protest too much. Hypocrisy or what?
At the end of the day it is the right of ASDA not to reproduce the image. I suspect the staff are probably more fearful of being sacked 'cos the corporate image might - in different circumstances - be sullied than enjoying the giggle. The cost of a "one size fits all" policy can be quite high in the end.
"In this case we offered a number of alternatives including enlarging" ... and if it wasn't pornographic before, it sure will be afterwards.
Asda staff described it as pornographic, ergo el'reg was spot on.
However, if they have a no nudity policy, then they have a no nudity policy. But describing it as porn is just idiotic and this attitude that the human body is pornographic should be crushed.
I used to work for Asda and print off the pictures to use on the photocakes (or whatever they call them now) When I worked there it was up to my discretion if I chose to put nudity on the cake. I personally wasn't that bothered about doing them so done them.
Too many iffy laws and procedures about now. If that woman asked me to do her cake I would have done without having all the fuss. The only trouble I had while doing the cakes was when people wanted to put copyrighted pictures on which I had to decline.
'insisted his arse be protected by a "strategically-placed star"'
Hmmm, would that be a chocolate star?
My coat I am getting.
Papers and Magazines
They might as well get rid of the daily papers (Sun, Star, Sport, etc) and magazines (Nuts, Zoo, and whatever else there is) because according to Adsa's standards these are pornographic as well....
This isnt "utter foolishness", this is about having a sensible no nudity policy. Just becuase its a naked baby, dosnt mean they can circumvent the policy.
Having a no nudity policy means that the staff dont have to decide what is good nudity and what is utter filth......
Think of the patisere madness that would ensue!! Open oyster shots on a battenburg? Victorias secret on a victoria sponge? and i hate to think what could be added to the chocolate eclairs.......
Asda <> Wal*Mart
Strangely enough, Asda do NOT enforce Wal*Mart's policies over here (yet) - if they did, the prices would be a lot cheaper, staff morale would be much lower and the stores would be packed floor-to-ceiling with anything you could ever want (from baby toys and clothes to car tyres and fishing tackle, through to floral arrangements for putting on your grave once you're dead).
Also, I'd be able to get model aircraft and things at a reasonable price instead of paying up to 10 times the prices in the States!
From what I remember, Wal*Mart [i]does[/i] sell "adult" video games, they just don't put them on shelves where kids can get at them - mebbe this is something shops over here should try, rather than just making the little buggers ask the nearest tall person to get it down for them...
But I do agree with your first comment, this is just another example of the knee-jerk censorship practised by people who have no common sense and cannot be bothered to think for themselves.
Why the pirate icon? You see a mention of WallyWorld and you really need to ask??
ASDA has a policy of No Larfs on company time.
nudity = pornography?
Always something the English have had a problem with.
@Tom Watson: Good point!
Fear and loathing
I imagine this is more to do with Asda stuff covering their own arses, having no doubt been indoctrinated by their idiot employers that Nudity Is Wrong. Walmart is American after all...
BTW, James Pickett (above), pleased to meet you - assuming you're not an imposter!
So they'll censor a cake with a baby's bottom?
How come they wouldn't apologise when one of their staff stopped his Asda home shopping delivery van outside our house on a summer's afternoon and proceed to have oral sex with his companion in full view of myself and other neighbours, even kids coming home from school?
If anyone doubts that, I have the proof on video - very clear and very explicit video.
@Hand Themselves In
"The employee whose first thought was 'pornographic' when presented with that picture needs to take themselves and their computer down to the nearest Police Station and hand themselves in, as it's obvious they're not well!"
No, they are just showing the expected symptoms of checking themselves before committing some harmless action as State or Populace may currently deem said action to be "objectionable".
Take photograph on street - Check whether police or sensitive building or kids are nearby.
Talk on the phone - Check whether you mention "terrorism" or "Iran"
Speak to Muslim - Check whether this happens in a businesslike manner and a well-lit place.
Speak to secretary - Check whether the door is open or colleague nearby.
See photograph of naked baby - Check whether there is a well-placed star.
and on, and on..
i seem to have mixed up two storys. the "peadophilia think tank" one, and this "baby cake pornography" one. As an AC mentioned this article dosent actually mention peadophilia at all.....this mix up kinda proves the other story tho huh?!!
applogies oh mighty Reg. I seek forgiveness for sullying your name and comparing you to that rag the daily mail.
Coat? I think its the one thats just been chucked out the door.......
Not only did common sense depart these shores upon the arrival of said madness, so did the nation's humour.
I think we have now become more miserable than the Belgians. (sorry Belgium)
Adding a star turns nudity into pornography
Without the star it is just innocent nudity. With the star it is definitely pornography.
It seems like everyone has an imaginary paedophile in their heads nowadays to consult at times like this. They ask: "How would this look to a paedophile?", and the imaginary paedophile answers, "Just the stuff I like". Once upon a time most people were innocent, but now it seems that everyone carries around their own personal paedophile. There have never been so many paedophiles on the streets, most of them carried around by 'concerned' members of the public.
barking spider ?
Eh ? pls explain
Would the Barron Knights "Little White Bum" qualify as paedo music?
Well, the beeb quotes ASDA as saying a star could be put over the 'offending' area. And I have an issue with the description of her baby's bum as being offending. Offensive? To whom?
Why not ban all photographs with nudity? So you go to Asda photo-developing and get 'CENSORED' over any offending skin? Aren't the photos just as 'offensive'?
My initial thought, like yours, is that we must be protected from ourselves. We are not capable of making our own judgements and decisions and need to be guided to do the inoffensive thing.
Then, however, I realised I'd be offended if I had a photo banned for offensive reasons and I realise I can't think for myself anymore.
Now if only the govt would enforce the pornography laws on all nudity then there wouldn't be any grey areas to confuse us,
It might be difficult to change clothes without being nude and I don't think they'd go so far as to check your bedroom, unless they suspected you were a paedoterrist - and clearly illegal nudity of that sort would confirm you were - however I don't see why we need one rule for cakes and another for photos and another for people.
@Mike & Matt
So what? If a paying customer wants it, exactly who is "harmed"? Maybe I HATE football (I do BTW) and am always put out (current PC definition of HURT) by the stupid ball stickers people put on their cars.
Ultimately, my point is that if Asda wishes NOT to take the woman's money let them try that in a FAIR market. Maybe it will be a successful strategy or maybe it won't. But it is good and proper to hold them up as a corporation which is enforcing it's version of morals on the public. Then let the public decide how they feel about that.
And the Royal Navy along with a certain lack of intestinal fortitude for what needed to be done vis-a-vis the Tower of London exported this "PURITANICAL" view to... well... the entire English speaking world. The most notable of which have to be the "puritans" themselves:boatloads of religious fanatics that thought the Church of England was just unbearably liberal so they traveled the ocean to set up their own religious oligarchy. While the "Witch Trials" didn't catch on, the perverse "morals" are alive and well, but now they have nuclear weapons.
Quite apart from the daftness of censoring a picture of a baby, what kind of pikey buys a cake from Asda? Come on! It's not exactly rocket science to make a cake from scratch, and a home made cake shows that you actually care about the person you're giving it to. Seriously. I'm appalled by the laziness of the nation - a nation that would rather watch big-celebrity-dragons-get-me-out-of-wifeswap-den-brother or play duke-grand-theft-quake-enstein IX rather than do something creative or learn something new.
No wonder this country is as sick as it is. Of course there'll be bad-shit going down if people lock themselves in their homes or cars, wanking themselves stupider over consumed content. The only way you build utopia is go outside. Walk. Say hello to your neighbours. Build something yourself. Stand up to bullies. And wave two fingers to government when they try to pass stupid laws.
Apologies. I seem to have gotten myself hot, bothered, ranty and sidetracked. Still, got to qualify as a flame - hasn't it?
They have magazine racks with FHM girls showing their arses in a gstring cupping their naked boobs.
Tell me - why is it always one rule for company's selling stuff, and a completely different rule for the rest of us. Next they will be putting pamper's on the top shelf and covered with a black bin-liner.....
What about the advertising campaign?
This is ASDA that have the whole advertising campaign of people tapping their arses? Admittedly they generally have clothes on but it is a bit contradictory!
Why put so much effort into complaining
Walk from Shop.
Go into other shop that will do it.
a Belgian says ...
... that's just not funny.
...are you actually suggesting that there's something inherently wrong with the notion of BUYING A CAKE? I'm sure ASDA's cake's are fairly ropey, but am I no longer allowed to pop into Paul and buy myself some tasty patisserie because you deem it morally objectionable?
- Does Apple's iOS make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets with glowing KILL RAY
- Video Snowden: You can't trust SPOOKS with your DATA
- 166 days later: Space Station astronauts return to Earth