Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 10:11 GMT
"This is not a typical business model for Microsoft." .... With the typical business model for Microsoft being to purchase/buy off/buy in Coders who can Inject their Wishes by Magic Proxy?
‘Microsoft: keep your sticky mitts off our language runtime’ .... Yeah, like anyone is likely to listen whenever their Keys Open a Treasure Chest or they have a Map to King Solomon's Mines.
Can you think of any good reason why it should not be a case of "embrace, extend and extinguish" for anyone who would pimp "embrace, extend and extinguish".
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 10:22 GMT
What's a 'first-full' release?
One that's full of 'firsts' ?
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 13:46 GMT
Hmm yeah it's our code you can't have it. Oh and you want this add-on well that will be a $50 download thanks..
I never did see the whole thrill of the ".NET" maybe because I'm not a "real" programmer, just dabble in php, mysql and other web based stuff.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 15:55 GMT
There are many open source projects that don't accept external contributions. Just because the source is provided and you are allowed to make changes doesn't mean that they have to use your changes. It would be helpful to know whether the DLR will continue to be licensed with the Ms-PL.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 19:51 GMT
"Can you think of any good reason why it should not be a case of 'embrace, extend and extinguish' for anyone who would pimp 'embrace, extend and extinguish'."
Did you almost just make sense?
Posted Friday 13th June 2008 09:29 GMT
"@amanfromMars ... Did you almost just make sense?" .... By Edward Amsden
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 18:23 GMT
No, of course not, you may have just understood, Edward. That bodes well for the Future. :-)
Posted Saturday 14th June 2008 00:47 GMT
The DLR will continue to be licensed under Ms-Pl:
http://blog.jimmy.schementi.com/2008/06/dlr-will-continue-to-be-licensed-under.html
Back to the article
