Phorm has nothing to do with the slump #
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 10:43 GMT
So lets blame
"housing slowdown and booming sales of mobile broadband"
and forget the lack of trust, and data pimping issues.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 10:43 GMT
The Carphone Warehouse is suffering.. because too many people are choosing mobile broadband over fixed lines.
What next? Is BP going to suffer from too many people driving instead of walking? McDonalds due to too many people choosing fried foods?
Paris, because she knows her core market
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 10:43 GMT
So lets blame
"housing slowdown and booming sales of mobile broadband"
and forget the lack of trust, and data pimping issues.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 11:47 GMT
That both of their ISP brands - talktalk and AOL, are just terrible?
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 11:47 GMT
I'd say the kind of person who gets their broadband through CPW doesn't even know what Phorm is, let alone what's wrong with it.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 11:47 GMT
It's because CPW use AOL's LLU network for their TalkTalk broadband, and they also own AOL. So, you get everyone being shoved on AOL's LLU and realising how crap it is. So, they leave, and they aren't counted as customers. CPW need excuse, so CPW finds "trend" in slowdown of ADSL connections and increase in mobile connections mainly because mobile connections don't use AOL's LLU.
Paris - because even she knows how to keep people happy... :)
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 11:48 GMT
@Anonymous Coward
Concerns over Phorm and the like really are confined to the IT geek chatosphere. The average broadband subscriber has much lower expectations and is much less informed than you think.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 12:35 GMT
with the housing marking in full scale decline pretty much anthing can now be blamed on plummeting house prices, it's fair game
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 12:35 GMT
Dont they use Opal telecom's LLU net? thought thats why they acquired it.
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 13:05 GMT
Andrew,
Talk Talk isn't used via AOL's LLU network.
They are both seperate networks. Talk Talk LLU is used via MPF and AOL's BB offering is via SMPF. These are 2 different connection methods. Plus both Networks are also run through different routers and utilise differnet eqpt.
I'd double check the facts before posting...
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 13:05 GMT
Well at least BT offer voip phones and set top boxes and Virgin offer cableTV. wheres as CPW offer?? spamwebcentral?
Posted Thursday 12th June 2008 22:47 GMT
If they both use different systems, how come a friend of mine on TalkTalk has an IP address in the same range as another friend on AOL most of the time?
I can't remember it off hand, but only the last set of digits seems to change. That's where my assumption came from.
IT? - because it shows my apparent lack of understanding...
Posted Friday 13th June 2008 09:36 GMT
Well, I assumed they both use different systems as I work for CPW Networks (the new name for Opal telcom) and have worked on some aspects of Talk Talk's network in my time.
Plus there is the fact that AOl use one supplier for their kit and CPWN use another supplier will also imply that they are different networks?
Posted Monday 16th June 2008 03:55 GMT
not necessaily, just that they use multiple vendors, indpendent networks have their own Autonomous System (AS) numbers.
@ Andrew It maybe that AOL UK customers have been shunted onto CPW Networks' LLU network (which would make more economic sense than trying to operate two infrastructures) and so the customers of both brands will be served IPs from the same IP address block which would explain what you are observing.
The RIPE database is a good place to check IP block allocations http://www.ripe.net
Posted Monday 16th June 2008 04:06 GMT
I really really hope that company goes titsup
They provide a dire broadband service (I've never used them but know plenty of people that have) with dire support, DNS problems, throttling of applications that aren't P2P at all, you name it, they can screw it up.
As for dealing with their core incompetency let me twll you of my couple of experiences with this dreadful organisation.
1) About 8 years ago I had an excellent Ericsson S868 mobile, unfortunately it fell off my belt one day onto its aerial which bent and seemed to be affecting call quality, when I got home I proceeded to look on CPW's site for a replacement one (went to the site thinking that it was unlikely that they would stock such a part in my local branch)
Found the screw in aerial I needed and proceeded to order.
When it turned up they had sent me an aerial for an A1018 rather than an S868, therefore it would not fit, fair enough, mistakes do happen so I ring up 'customer services' and tell the guy that I had been sent the wrong part and asking whether he could arrange a swap "what do you want me to do about it?" was his helpful response.
So I went to the local branch and asked to speak to the manager, the salesbod was unwilling to get the manager or give me a refund until I told him that I would hand the matter over to my credit card company to recover the purchase price, the manager came out and was extrenely apologetic and said he would feed back about this, he checked for the part and said they did not have one at all in CPW and so gave me a refund.
2) Fast forward a few years and I was looking for a SIM free Motorola V600, I went with CPW as they were the cheapest, I ordered the phone and got a delivery date (which was a saturday) I booked the day off and nothing showed up (it showed up on a tuesday while I was at work and so I had to go down and pick it up from the courier depot.
I mailed to complain, even just an apology would have been nice, but I got bugger all response from them so frankly I think its not surprising that their sales are decreasing.
Here's to a bankrupt Charles Dunstone.
Sign up, sign up for The Register's weekly mobile & wireless newsletter - click here