The would be "breached" not "breeched" right?
As they say, a hull in the breech is not a breach in the hull. (Cough).
Apart from that, who in his right mind thinks that licensing a patent to someone but them sticking ass-retarded stuff like restrictions on mixing with other technologies onto it should be the basis of an enforceable contract in the first place? Either you sell your monopoly on the problem ... sorry, solution - or you don't.