I would like to know myself what the illegal images could be. For instance I find a picture of Jacqui Smith (or however she spells her first name) makes me want to puke so is that offensive? Who actually chooses what is illegal. They will probably choose some old fart of a peer to run the board that makes the choice. The rest will probably be ex-bishops. Can you imagine how many pictures are on the internet, 10s of billions I suppose, and will they all have to be vetted? Even if 2 pictures were taken at the same time one could be classed as illegal and another not.
Some pictures should be illegal (eg Child Porn, but isn't that what the IWF is for?). Some members of the govenernment could be involved in some things behind closed doors that could be considered illegal if someone took pictures of it.
When did you last vote on a specific issue? I certainly never have. What we live in in the UK is an elected Dictatorship. Most MPs only vote how there leader tells them too.
Sorry got off topic there.