
I agree fossil fuels are indeed a limited resource; if we have to use them then we should at least see the tax revenues from them in Scotland, not being sucked up by the English to spend on Dome's and Olympics and other assorted foolings.
Moreover, I think you should have some more knowledge, and more pride in your home country;
Scotland is a world exporter in whisky, it's not just Scotland's, but also the UK's biggest export. It's one of Scotland's most important industries. It's been stifled by overtaxing by the English. Funny, since the English don't really make any spirits, yet love all the tax revenues the Scottish whisky companies contribute.
Not only does Scotland export whisky though, we also export many other things, including a much larger share of the UK engineering and manufacturing industry per-head than England. Something else we export is water and energy.
The English depend on Scottish water. When was the last time you heard of Scotland having a hosepipe ban?
Ditto on the energy thing. Scotland already accounts for a large share of the renewables produced in Europe. Scotland has, probably, the best renewables prospects in Europe what with the potential for offshore wind, tide, wave etc.
Actually it's all doing rather well. Would be better without English "help", but that's the story with a lot of things in Scotland.
But, feel free to continue in your merry london-party voting "we cannae dae it" ways. Since you'll no doubt do a faster u-turn on this than Bendy Wendy would come independence and the massive upturn in growth, jobs, the economy and pride that Scotland will have, I'll be seeing you in, ooh, maybe 5 years.
Saying that, apparently Wendy Alexander is "secure absolutely" her position.
Better make that 3 years then. She's like a walking billboard for why we don't need her kind, the interference from London, nor any of the "we cannae dae it" crowd any longer. If London's so damned brilliant, maybe you should consider staying there.