Re: I for one... #
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:26 GMT
Nobody suspects the googleinquisition
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 11:58 GMT
...and would like to offer my services to the googleinquisition in rounding up others to work in their off world googlemines.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:13 GMT
IIRC, a certain L Ron Hubfraud mentioned starting a new religion as the easiest way to make a fortune. The amazing thing is that he was right...
(Paris, as she knows the second easiest way)
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:26 GMT
The Church of Google already exists: http://www.thechurchofgoogle.org/
Do some googling before posting, no?
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:26 GMT
Can't seem to get registered at Googleoverlords.com saying missing Google Overlord ID number? keeps redirecting to GooglePeon.com.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:39 GMT
In the beginning there was was Google and the search was good. I'm considering converting from Pastafarian. I like new shiny golden calfs!
The penguin because I hope this new religion is open source.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:59 GMT
I suspect that they've got bored of providing search queries and are planning to instead provide every possible sector of the internet themselves.
How long before all newborn children have the google suffix in front of their names and are fully search query complient. "Hi I'm Google.Peter, what would you like to know about me officer?"
Mine's the jacket with the copy The Daily Newspeak in the pocket....
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:59 GMT
Well, other religions have propounded "do nothing evil" in their time, too.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 12:59 GMT
Do you need an asistant? You seem to spend most of your work time scanning WHOIS and news sites for funny stuff. I do that at work for free (Although my boss would be very upset if he knew). I would love to be paid for it :-)
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 13:07 GMT
Googleoverlords.com?
It would seem logical, particular as overlords.com is already in use...
Mine's the one with the barcode on the back.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 13:07 GMT
I'm afraid the new religion is "Religion as a Service", so they can change the holy books but they dont need to share their work.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 13:34 GMT
What an excellent idea! Finally they can launch AdSense Adult Edition and start making some bucks off all that porn traffic they generate :-)
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 13:34 GMT
Going off on a tangent, can anyone explain why we don't see (for example) gmail.sucks.com or gmail.sucks.org? Surely there's money in it.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 14:45 GMT
Having a ".gog" TLD. That would be domination.
Incidently, if they've taken:
goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com
are:
gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com
and:
gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com
available?
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 18:56 GMT
Just got an e-mail from www.beontopranking-google.com, a rather dodgy-seeming link directory.
And, shouldn't it be: goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle
or
g0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000gle
both of which are available (or seem to be)
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 18:56 GMT
www,googlesexchange.com..
Mine's the white one with the extra long sleeves.
Posted Thursday 24th April 2008 18:56 GMT
Do they look like lizards? Do they come from Zeta Reticuli?
Do they taste like chicken?
Mine's the 'gator skin overcoat...
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 02:03 GMT
"Expires on..............: 2008-Jun-19."
Anyone want to keep an eye on it and see if they renew? :o)
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 02:03 GMT
http://www.googlesux.com/ is up and running (and NOT owned by google, from what I can see). They need a couple lessons in SMS speech probably.
Also, I'd bet my shirt that they didn't register googleisapileofshitwhichcouldn'tfinditsownmotherinabrothel.com, though it's barely longer than goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle.com
Mine's the one which reads "'Paris Hilton' hot site:hotnudesexyceleb.sex.com" on the back
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 02:03 GMT
Should you accept it, of course. We need a survey on how the members of the w3 consortium (list here: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List) comply to the w3 "standards". I tested MS already, no surprise: the w3 checker found 26 errors on www.microsoft.com. We need you to investigate the other members' pages. (of course, you can dig further in MS website, just for fun. The Office page contains 55 errors).
If you were to be caught, etc....
Have fun!
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 07:26 GMT
"Your search - googlebollocks.com - did not match any documents."
(Is tempted)
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 10:08 GMT
is flying spaghetti monsterism, AKA Pastafarianism. Look it up.
"Touched by His noodly appendage"
Posted Saturday 26th April 2008 05:37 GMT
I was surprised they hadn't registered either of "goggle.com" or "goggles.com", which I would have imagined would be where a lot of mis-spellers end up. They do have googel.com though.
I wonder if they have registered the "org" sites too: there is "google-watch.org" and "scroogle.org", both anti-google sites.