Who needs sleep :)

I don't see any problem either, but I've always thought that people should be able to take any drug they feel like, within reason, as long as they're educated about the effects and don't try to drive, hurt someone, or otherwise turn into a raving piece of shit when they're under the influence. Sadly, it seems that only a minority of the populace can be trusted to safely use anything (including especially alcohol)

"Reality is for people that can't handle drugs"

...when are the neural nanonics systems coming out, that's what I want to know! Much better for increasing mental capacity!

Or even better, just splice me with an affinity capable gene. Then I can talk to anyone anywhere without those pesky "mobile" thingy's.

*sigh* If only Sci-Fi were easy to implement.....

C8H10N4O2

Huh?

"that many of the world's boffins are routinely taking" ....

"All but one of the 14 British scientists who responded ordered online."

So. 13 British scientists are "many"?

At least we know who's been keeping the spamvertized pill peddlers happy...

LSD/DNA?

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=22271

As a someone who takes Beta blockers for medical reasons, I can testify that they most certainly do not aid the thought process...

"Today, a young man on acid realised that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration and that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There's no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and you are the imagination of yourself. Here's Tom with the weather...!"

This explains a lot of the research that goes on.

From the Department of the Bleeding Obvious:

"Hey man, I like girls."

"Me too, man."

"Wow man. We should publish!"

"Wanna co-author?"

"I love ya, man."

note: repeated use of 'man' is geeks being 'cool'.

I have to agree with the guy that says provided reasonable information is out there regarding health risks, people should be allowed to do whatever they like to themselves.

As for drug driving, the solution imo is to make it legal between the hours of 3-4am but only on roads without corners, traffic lights, roundabouts, stop signs, give way signs - and with lanes 3 times the normal size. CCTV cameras should be positioned along the entire route and the best accidents shown on TV.

or recreational, it's all good.

So long as you don't (potentially) hurt anyone other than yourself, fine.

Say, are those *brownies*?

I have a prescription for modafinil for a couple of years now and it has worked very well for the off-label treatment of my ADD as well as helping out when I just need to be sharp at the office.

I know about 3 other people who also take it for one reason or another and the only side effect that we all experience is that while it does not make you amped, jittery, or crash, as soon as the "sharpening" kicks in everyone gets gabby if they have not been taking it regularly.

Great thoughts, insights, and conversations- but a seeming inability to shut up.

Kind of funny to experience really.

However... the military grade anti-narcoleptic effects are absolutely priceless when it comes to making long drives late at night or for making it possible to be awake and functional~ish through monday in a cubicle after an all nighter!

(the GO symbol because I'm getting gabby right now...)

I'd be guzzling them by the handful. First people to work out a relatively safe surgical method of increasing intelligence, concentration etc will see me among the lines outside.

I was recently diagnosed with adult ADD. I have to say that the prescription I take of 10mg Dextroamphetamine 3x a day has produced in incredable improvement in my cognitive abilities.

Yay for prescrition speed. Eeek!

The best way to describe it is that I get a clarity brought about by a fog being lifted. Other than that I feel nothing different, but there are very clear and quantifiable improvements in my abilities.

My Dr said though that in in folks who don't have my condition it produces all kinds of weird neurological effects which may appear to the consumer to have the same effects as in me, but actually produces a measurable degredation in performance. Also a feeling of a high, and loss of sleep.

Sounds like dutch courage and a couple of pints...

No Ill effects at aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazjbvsfbvradsbhvo;iehrt

g'ci kqPKErk'ELRWN<M BFJ<B L?ICHX P/HD;VJNDEMEFKLwkl.....

Now if someone wins a Nobel Prize or a Fields Medal and was found to be on performance enhancers after the mandatory drug test can they be stripped of their medal? And if so will the medal be awarded to the runner up?

My urine may someday prove to be more valuable than pre-ingested coffee beans.

"C8H10N4O2"

Cbhionaoz? What the hell are you talking about? Geez... some people have no idea how to communicate.

How long before we see drug testing at the noble awards?

I stick to the little pills I get from the shifty bloke in the corner of the nightclub. They help my concentration and mental ability much better than anything a chemist could sell me.

Or maybe it just seems that way.

> Sadly, it seems that only a minority of the populace can be

> trusted to safely use anything (including especially alcohol)

But AC, they *can* be trusted. I've personally known users of both cocaine and meth who were fully functional citizens when they weren't partaking, and sometimes even when they were. In the world at large, everyone knows that drug use is endemic in some occupations, yet the work gets done to a more than acceptable standard.

Besides, whether they're trusted or not, those who choose to use extra-legal meds have no difficulty getting a supply.

What's implied by your comment is that everyone that dabbles in any sort of 'chemical enhancement' or recreation is only imagining any improvement, while to the rest of the 'sober', intelligent people, they look like utter fools. There's certainly some merit to that argument---anyone that's seen a friend go through the various stages of tequila (eg. handsome, brilliant, bulletproof) can attest to the fallacy of that viewpoint. Been on both sides of that one myself. However, your implied generalization that anyone that takes anything is merely fooling themselves, is at least as bad. True, it's only the 'train wrecks' that make the evening news. For every five people that manage to screw themselves over horribly or kill a family of four while high on something, I'd estimate that there's one or two people that quietly use 'artificial means' for performance enhancement or recreation to some positive effect. I'd have to agree though that anyone that buys anything from a spammer is in need of a dose of common sense.

For the best and worst:

www.erowid.org

on concentration in the short term but then you sort of driffftt ooffffffffffffffffffffff