so that's like.. #
Posted Friday 4th April 2008 21:55 GMT
a day in iraq then? slow news day?
Posted Friday 4th April 2008 15:56 GMT
That's less than $1 per head on average. Equivalent to 1% of the population losing $100 once a year to "cybercrime." Or one out of a thousand citizens losing $1000 annually.
Sounds like chickenfeed to me.
Somebody refresh my memory: what's the aggregate cost so far of the Iraq and Afghanistan incursions?
Posted Friday 4th April 2008 16:19 GMT
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home
Posted Friday 4th April 2008 21:55 GMT
These statistics are completely understated.
Posted Friday 4th April 2008 21:55 GMT
So if you read the terms of Ebay Paypal , they must be coining the money in by doubling up the losses of the unfortunate seller , by a simple stroke of a key !
Posted Saturday 5th April 2008 15:46 GMT
After seeing so many inflated guesstimates from computer security vendors over the past decade, it's good to see some hard numbers reported in by some very real people. The one dollar per person, as suggested by RW, sounds plausible. Serious enough to warrant attention, but not stupid.
Compare: "Code Red has already cost an estimated $1.2 billion in damage, and may top out at an incredible $8.7 billion when its bitter reign of destruction finally ends."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/08/02/code_red_hysteria_8_7bn/
So, $240 million lost to real, reported fraud compared to $8.7 billion lost to imaginary, guesstimated damage from a single piece of malware. I wonder if any of the Code Red-affected folks filed insurance claims.
Posted Monday 7th April 2008 08:27 GMT
The damage from Code Red was far from imaginary. As someone who was involved in the clean-up for one major international company, I'd say the figure quoted was perfectly realistic.
Your continued restating of the fallacy that viruses cost nothing and impact no-one is irresponsible
Sign up, sign up for The Register's weekly IT security newsletter - click here