I have an urge...

To create 4 separate sites on Network Solutions.

1. Critical of Christianity and the Bible

2. Critical of Islam and the Koran

3. Critical of Judaism and the Torah.

4. Critical of Scientology.

To use (essentially*) the same criticisms of each, and see which gets pulled first. Particularly with 1-3 seeing as they share the same root.

(* ie the entire concept of control of the masses via fear of the angry sky-fairy, "jam tomorrow" reward systems, scientific improbability etc)

Probably for the best that I can't be arsed spending the time and money to follow all my urges... I don't really fancy being sued by the Scientologists whilst avoiding Jihadis, Mossad & rabid evangelicals!!

We are all violators

http://www.networksolutions.com/legal/aup.jsp

Transmission, distribution, uploading, posting or storage of any material in violation of any applicable law or regulation is prohibited. This includes, without limitation, material protected by copyright, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual property right used without proper authorization, and material that is obscene, defamatory, libelous, unlawful, harassing, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, constitutes an illegal threat, violates export control laws, hate propaganda, fraudulent material or fraudulent activity, invasive of privacy or publicity rights, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable material of any kind or nature.

Isn't all content in violation of some law someplace?

Let's see if we can get them to yank cnn.com for being in violation of Chinese media laws.

-HJC

What raiders of the lost ark sequel

Can we have that banned, you can just tell its going to be pants.....

on 2nd thoughts dont ban it, as then people may hear about it.

I think people should be able to criticise any religion, its their *opinion* of it, does not mean I then have to believe it, or that they are right about it, I have my own mind thanks very much, and as such, my opinion is all religions are fake and just early forms of controlling the masses, now we have TV and the news...

post anon as i dont want a mailbag full of 'non believer you will burn' spam.....

Boo hoo

Man who wants people's mouths taped shut gets his taped shut. Cry me a river of blood.

This isn't a free speech issue. Network Solutions are entitled to turn away the business of anyone they choose.

@AC

"I have my own mind thanks very much" unlike religious people who have to be told what is right and wrong. Heard a bloke on the radio once said that people who didn't believe in God (that's the Christian non-Catholic brand of God) can not possibly understand the difference between right and wrong. And here's little ol' atheist me having never mugged an old lady, where as religious types regularly practice genocide. Who'da thunk?

Post non-anon as I find "you will burn in a hell which doesn't exist" emails amusing

Reply with "Is there a heaven/hell for budgies?" If humans have one, why not? Mine is smarter than most people and has never broken any commandments :P

Fear of the fear.

Another stupid knee jerk reaction. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, however it seems that more and more, one person's opinion is worth less than that of another. You will never appease these religious groups, as seen in the newspaper's in Europe publishing some cartoons or the Miss World event episode in Nigeria, each sparked riots and murder often affecting people that had nothing to do with the incident. Or a book about the 3 little pigs denied an award because it may have offended, political correctness gone mad.

People seem only too content to do anything to avoid offending these groups but in turn are only rewarding them for their violence.

My comment probably wont even be published due to "offensive content".

Interesting side note

I thought this was an interesting side note,

They pull an anti Muslim site,

so why are they still hosting www.antichristian.com ?

How to generate even more publicity......

Is to file a number of complaints, on some crappy movie you are about to release, to some US ISP who was dumb enough to provide you the webspace......

This is exactly how Hollowood would go about to hype a movie which really costed mega-money and no one wants to see it.

Free speech at its finest

This reminds me very much of the good (not really) old soviet times when we were told to condemn Rambo movies due to the Afghanistan or whatever, although nobody had seen the movies. It's amazing how the world has turned around. Taking down a website in a supposedly democratic country because a movie nobody had seen may offend a theocracy on the other side of the world - how backwards is that? It's like Americans boycotting '84 Olympics because Russians may get offended by it... Bring back Cold War, at least it made sense.