huh? #
Posted Monday 17th March 2008 22:10 GMT
Wordwhat?
Posted Monday 17th March 2008 22:10 GMT
See articles and comments at
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080317124445613"
and
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/12/those-who-forget-santayana.html
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:01 GMT
I remember word perfect 5.1....
Can we get a forgotten tech/This old box style article on Wordperfect?
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:01 GMT
Why don't these guys do a standard on Cobol. Then make changes. They might finally get the fight they deserve!
Oh, well. Wishful thinking.
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:01 GMT
All-in-all a cool program, that was sent to its almost grave by the evil hamsters who live in Redmond, WA. May it rise again! Hmmm, now I'm having Christopher Lee flashbacks...
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:01 GMT
Microsoft withheld (hidden) API’s for themselves and gave other organizations API’s that didn’t work with Windows as well (less memory).
So if Microsoft illegally used it’s OS to gain dominance in other areas, then this is a prime example of that.
People are often too quick to forget or are just plain ignorant of the facts.
Microsoft deserves to lose this and pay out a settlement many more times than Novell could have made from it’s office suite.
Thankfully nobody owns the Internet as a platform. At least on that platform you can create and innovate and not have anyone give you dodgy API’s because all the protocols on the Internet are open and free to use. Everybody has the same advantage.
To me, this is one more reason why innovating on Windows is a waste of time. The Internet is the platform and the future. Microsoft killed off innovation on Windows by trying to own all the software that was being built on top. How selfish was that. VCs even gave up financing ideas if they were Windows dependent. The result is that Windows is dying because of it’s lack of innovation.
In the meantime Microsoft should be held accountable for their past behavior.
http://www.weblogs.co.nz/
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:01 GMT
If memory serves correct, Microsoft started screwing Novell the moment they (MS) took aim on server class, um, services... It wasn't the fact that anything that Microsoft did anything better than Novell; from a purely technical perspective, netware was far superior any MS Server product in read/write speed, stability, recovery, etc, once you managed to separate it from ipx/spx. I was really bummed when it fell out of favor for NT. So, I really hope they bone Microsoft in court.
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 09:23 GMT
Novell is suing the same company (MS) they paid off to avoid possibly being sued for something no one is sure exists ("stolen" MS code in Linux)...
Talk about old fashioned dirty fighting... Go Novell :-)
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 10:09 GMT
Tim, you forget that in this deal to secure MS "IP" in Linux, MS paid more money to Novell than Novell have to pay MS. And MS's return was only a cut of the sales of SuSE Linux via coupons redeemable.
And when lawyers pointed out that if MS give away these vouchers and they are not redeemed until SuSE goes for GPL3, then MS's "IP" (if any) has been released under GPL3, MS decided not to sell them.
That scheme merely seemed to be a payment to Novell with a promise to Novell that they will scare people off Linux but those that stayed with Linux would become Novell customers. MS wanted to be able to point PHB's to this agreement and say "See! Novell agreed that we have rights in Linux and paid us for it!". Novell got cash and sold the idea that RH (who were spanking Novell in Linux) would die.
Posted Tuesday 18th March 2008 16:31 GMT
"But Microsoft argued that because Novell did not offer a competing operating system, it could not bring action under anti-trust laws."
And NetWare is what exactly?
Sadly, I feel this antitrust lawsuit should have happened 10-15 years ago, when it actually could've turned the tide.
WordPerfect was a pretty good text editor in the good old DOS days, back in the days when I had my 286 with an monochrome ... or well, amber-letter CRT.
For truly neat stuff, I used Aldus PageMaker on my Mac Plus. I miss those days...