Recent claims that Pioneer is planning to get out of sub-46in plasma panel production in favour of sourcing them through a third-party may have only been the start of things. It’s now being said that the company is finalising plans to outsource the whole lot. Last week, Japanese newspaper Asahi reported that Pioneer is looking …
No money in the high end?
Pioneer plasmas may be painfully expensive, but their 1080p ones are about the best screen you can get, of any technology. It's a pity to see them go.
What about that super-cool "Project Kuro" ones they were showing off at CES, that could go to all-the-way black for effectively infinite contrast ratios? They looked awesome.
When will we finally see SED technology for our screens?
Plasma is defiinitely 20th century tech and LCD has almost had its' day. We should see OLED and SED battling it out this year for better and brighter screens this year - well, here's hoping.
I thought that was a beer you got in Japanese restaurants...
@Anonymous, re: SED
I would also love to see SED. However, at the moment I believe Canon have locked horns with our old Texas based litigious friends Nano Proprietary who own the patent, and are miffed that Canon, who licenced it, have sub licenced it to Toshiba. There's been a big court battle going on for a while, during which the whole project has been mothballed.
Honestly? Due to Patent issues I don't ever envisage anyone will ever make SED TV's as if Nano Proprietary are being litigious with Canon, no one in their right mind will want to licence it from them as they won't want the hassle. Sad as that is, it will give OLED a lead in the manufacturing and maturity stakes, and I think we'll see the technology process skip SED entirely - talk about cutting off your own nose to spite your face!
plasma is dead
ok, i'm talking from a purely technical perspective here. I'm not talking about the fuzzy warm feeling and color temperature and other subjective stuff.
Manufacturers of the panels HATE plasma.
- the tube is expensive to make ( yes it is still a TUBE ! . its got gas in it)
- the tube is heavy.
- needs high excitation voltages ( 80 to 140 volts )
- the driving electronics for such voltages produces a lot of heat.
the overall bill of material is a lot higher.
LCD is cheap. these days they 'print' lcd panels wth an injet like tehcnology. Two sheets of glass. seam weld them , add a drop of LC fluid , close entry point. attach row and column drivers , attach reflector / diffuser / attach light source ( LED's these days. CCFL is on its way out ) control electronics is 1 LSI chip that doesnt even get warm.
very easy to produce at a BOM cost ( Bill of material) that is 1/3 of a plasma ...
Plasma will stay for a while , but only for the very large displays.
Pioneer has been bleeding red ink for years
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? Why can’t I walk past Maplin without buying stuff I don’t need?