amanfromtheMoon #
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 15:59 GMT
Is I suppose what happens when themanintheMoon multiplies and goes forth (IT angle for those old enough)
( Bomber jacket )
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 08:57 GMT
I didn't realise The Mole could fit into Thunderbird 3! Or can Thunderbird 2 now manage return trips to the moon!
The one with the marrionette strings attached please!
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 10:11 GMT
Is the Moon conductive to human life? Some ancient civilisations may have believed that the Moon was a God that had significant rule over on life on Earth, but in these enlightened times we've narrowed it down to tides, menstural cycles and the like.
Looking at alternative meanings, the Moon (under the grey outer surface) appears to consist of rust, so it's not conductive to electricity even. Now I'm just being silly.
This post has been deleted by a moderator
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 10:48 GMT
How long until we discover amanfromtheMoon?
Will he beam his thoughts down to Earth?
Will they make any more sense?!
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 11:02 GMT
This one gives the UK boffins experience on entry to the surface
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 11:02 GMT
To be pondering this kind of project, where the UK has a pretty poor track record (Beagle 2), at the same time that Keith Mason's STFC is ruthlessly cutting mainstream astrophysics, where the UK has been hugely successful, is frankly insane.
My guess is that this is Keith's way of generating some positive spin to distract public and politicians from the mess that he and STFC has made, albeit with the help of HMG who didn't stump up enough cash. But the amounts of money are small potatoes (80 million) compared to Iraq (a few billion) and Northern Rock (55 billion) so why not fix it and generate some *real* good news stories, not over-the-horizon, unlikely to happen or work fluff like Moon LITE?
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 11:37 GMT
I thought Beagle 2 tried to do that already. They just forgot to fit the drill to it so launched it into the planet at high velocity instead.
Or was that just to try and destroy Megatron?
The metallic jacket that turns into a taxi, please.
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 11:37 GMT
"so why not fix it and generate some *real* good news stories, not over-the-horizon, unlikely to happen or work fluff like Moon LITE?" .... By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 10:53 GMT
Crikey, that's easy to answer, AC. They are not Fit for ITs Purpose.
Those that are though, can QuITe easily change fiat paper money into ferrari gold. And I also note that the emptyheads always talk of things which are being discussed and will be revealed when market conditions improve/over-the-horizon etc etc. which all just means that they haven't made anything up which will be believable, which makes me wonder why they are being paid at all for their failure. Government is a Fraud and a Block on Private Enterprise in furtherance of Ignorance in Arrogance in Control.
Ok Rant over. And it does you good to Clear the Air.
I suppose sitting with your hands in the till makes it easy though.
And the Jolly Roger because I suppose they are all happy campers, but who would want to be one, with the spotlight on one's every move reported back to Base for Profiling and Grooming .........
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 15:12 GMT
Would this be the same Keith Mason pushing the ExoMars project - the one whose projected costs have just DOUBLED to £650M?
Would this be the same Keith Mason currently decimating whole areas of the UK science base - cancelling work on the international linear collider, withdrawing from Gemini telescopes, sacking half the UK's scientists?
What a stupid idea this project is. When is Keith Mason going to get the sack? Soon I hope.
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 15:59 GMT
Is I suppose what happens when themanintheMoon multiplies and goes forth (IT angle for those old enough)
( Bomber jacket )
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 16:19 GMT
How come they are no longer using manned space missions to the moon anymore and are sending probes launched from a craft that has not landed on the lunar surface?
Was there something that happened up there that has put NASA off from using manned flights? Surely excavation by a human is better than that conducted by a probe? Maybe there is something you haven't told us NASA boffins?
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 16:54 GMT
I'll be impressed when they plan a robot to seek fossils in the caverns of Uranus.
...mine's the one with a note saying "Mrs. Buttlestock's Third Grade Homeroom" pinned to the back.
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 17:09 GMT
I would expect the Mole people are going to be mightily pissed when told to bend over for a probe by something that just crashed through the ceiling.
Or maybe not.
Posted Tuesday 19th February 2008 18:41 GMT
Has someone hacked amanfromMars's account - that post made sense! I do hope he's not ill or anything - maybe an attack of Lunacy?
Posted Wednesday 20th February 2008 02:17 GMT
If it fires "three or four penetrator probes into the lunar crust", would a better name be Moon Far Underground Calibrated Knowledge Exploration Robot?
The space suit on the left, thanks.
Posted Thursday 21st February 2008 03:39 GMT
I'll bet those pesky Moonies have WMD hidden inside their deep dark caverns of hate [tm].
Mine's the long overcoat with the multi-colour scarf!
Posted Thursday 21st February 2008 21:51 GMT
Now I'll have to move my secret lunar base to elsewhere. Maybe I should try the Mariana Trench next.
Pesky sane boffins always getting in the way of my world domination plans.
Roboservant! My lab coat, please.