And the first step is admitting you have a problem......
Not that you have a "disease". You admit that you are an addict and are powerless.
I don't care how many people quote wikipedia (yeah, great source) or online dictionaries regarding the status of alcoholism as a disease.
Calling alcoholism a disease is an insult to truly ill people.
To answer some points:
"You can contract it socially"
LOL hilarious. Lets also call vandalism a disease, because weak minded sheep who cannot control themselves or their impulses can contract that socially too.
"You can pick up vulnerabilities to it genetically"
Can we have some proof on this one please. If ones parents are alcoholics, then one may follow the pattern due to learnt behavior, but there is no proof for a physical, genetic factor.
"It is neither viral nor bacterial, but psychological"
Agreed, but just because a person is psychologically weak, it doesn't justify a "disease" tag. Mentally ill perhaps, but not diseased.
"I'm assuming that the above posters think all addicts are weak, and just like a drink".
Actually, I DO feel that they are weak, and yes, they did start and continue drinking because they liked a drink. Nobody starts on the road to alcoholism because the don't like a drink.
Most of us who enjoy a drink have the psychological strength and sense not to abuse it - it's not like in this day and age that the dangers of alcohol are a big secret.
Calling alcoholism a disease is a way of excusing it. If its called a disease, you can imply that the person had no choice about it.
People prefer to call it a disease rather than an addiction because they want to avoid the negative impression addiction implies.
Hardly admitting you have a problem is it. Oh well, back to step one for you.