Designs for SpaceShipTwo displayed in New York
Glenn Alexander
My brain keeps parsing "Virgin Galactic" as... #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 05:23 GMT

"Virgin Catholic..."
I think either I need to get a p2p client with better spam filters soon or else take this opportunity to sell something to a casino via eBay?
Anonymous Coward
Too Much #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 05:23 GMT

I dont know about you but I dont find 100k down the back of the sofa that often
Aries1B
Virgin Galactic's Wings and Airports... #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 05:23 GMT

...vs the dramatic "Orion" water landings to come for NASA. Thanks, LockMart; inspirational!
Congratulations, Mr. Branson. Get her/Keep them flying.
b166er
Expensive? #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 08:43 GMT
I think the price is cheap, compared to how much it has taken to get things off the ground.
How long at that rate before Paul Allen and Richard Branson recoup their investment?
Sure, Virgin gets some healthy PR from it, but still. It's a great legacy for both of them, though perhaps a greater one would have been fixing Africa.
Anonymous Coward
Whatever #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 08:43 GMT

It's still only a lousy suborbital uselessity.
Andy Worth
Personally #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 08:43 GMT
I'd bite off my own legs to get onto one of those shuttles.
Greg
Training #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 09:41 GMT
What I want to know is, who gets to fly them, how are they chosen, and how are they trained? I would be genuinely interested to see a documentary on that.
Bill Fresher
windscreen #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 09:41 GMT
I wouldn't feel very confident flying into space in something with heart shaped windscreens.
michael
well done #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 10:09 GMT
at least somone is trying
@ too much
you obvoiulsy looking down the wrong sofa
Anonymous Coward
Virgin... #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 10:09 GMT

.. on the ridiculous. I'll get me spacehelmet
Mr Michael Strelitz
Green? #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 10:09 GMT

Is it?
andrew checkley
For Sale #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 10:19 GMT

34 Year old female. (Perfect Wife)
£100k
Excellent cook, Great in bed and really knows how to make her man feel special.
Makes an brilliant pack lunch for when you leave for work on those cold early mornings and often bakes a cake to add that little somthing else to your daily lunch.
Genuine reason for sale. Urgently require to raise funds for research into how great is must be for average joe to experiance space!
hugo tyson
Re: For Sale #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:12 GMT

Pictures?
Paul Brandon
@Whatever #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:38 GMT

You have to start somewhere, in the commercial world you don't risk going for the big one straight away. This opens up an oppurtunity to far more people (even if they need thousands) and a potential revenue stream that will pay for Tier 2, which is believed to be an Orbital craft on Scaled Composites drawing boards. Which will be infinitely more expensive due to the re-entry problems they'll have to solve when moving at orbital speeds. Besides once sub-orbital is proved it'll bring more investment. So it's a start and they're getting somewhere!
Jeff Dickey
Welcome to 1908, everyone.... #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:50 GMT

If the history of aviation a century ago is anything to go by, we've got a decade or two to go before suborbital or SSTO flight becomes reasonably commonplace. Let's just hope that we don't get sidetracked and then pushed to innovate faster by a World War.
Anonymous Coward
@ Andrew Checkley #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 12:59 GMT

I don't have the £100000, so would you consider setting up a timeshare?
Graham Bartlett
@1908: flight and space-flight #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 14:42 GMT
Be nice if it happens, Jeff. Trouble is that by 1908 most of the really tough questions had already been answered. Cayley had sussed the wing side, and Benz and co had sussed the engine side. All that needed doing was bolting the two together, which is why the Wright brothers were just one of many.
Problem right now is that the development of the basic components is still "rocket science". Maybe it wouldn't have been if NASA had done the sensible thing and used Apollo as the basis for their next-gen platform. Instead they went for the Space Shuttle to keep the air-force generals happy, and left all their working tech to rust. That's why NASA are now having to reinvent the Apollo wheel, because everything they've done in spaceflight for the last 25 years has been a pointless waste of time and only worked because of vast government spending.
On the plus side though, it's the reason there is private spaceflight (notably Ariane and other major lifters), because no government managed to make a decent job of it. And it's why SS2 and its successors are likely to clean up, because again they're driven by making it work in a cost-effective way. NASA couldn't recognise cost-effective if it beat them over the head with a foam mallet labelled "stick to your budgets"...
the inventor
How about Travel to Mars ? #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 16:40 GMT

Propose taking space shuttle round trip to Mars,
144 days ! - 67,000,000 miles/hr !
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14705
Now that's Traveling !!!!
the inventor
What about travel to Mars ? #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 16:43 GMT

Propose taking space shuttle round trip to Mars,
144 days ! - 67,000,000 miles/hr !
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14705
Now that's Traveling !!!!
black_triangles
about time #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 22:37 GMT
yes its 2008. hasnt it been long enough already since we got some kind of space travel. we are meant to be driving hovercars by 2010. good to see we made a step forward
Rich
Not so much the re-entry #
Posted Thursday 24th January 2008 22:37 GMT

That's the barrier to orbital flight, but the immense amount of fuel you need to launch even the lightest payload. There's a reason why a Saturn V's a big bastard.
Also, there is the related problem of achieving acceptable failure rates for passenger flight with that much energy around.
night troll
@ For Sale #
Posted Friday 25th January 2008 06:05 GMT

Does she know you've put her up for sale? If not I'd watch out for the powdered glass in those little cakes if I was you! ;-)
andrew checkley
night troll #
Posted Friday 25th January 2008 09:29 GMT

No more cakes for me!
michael
100k what would I buy #
Posted Friday 25th January 2008 09:29 GMT

small flat
wife
trip to space
hum
taxi "take me to the space port. let me stop to get my coat"
Jimbo
Its a Start #
Posted Sunday 27th January 2008 09:25 GMT

Well things will surely move on quicker once space has a commercial purpose, lets face it once any thing is commercialised it goes bonkers and more insane investment will happen...
25 years later we will be on Mars! Just who gets the first Virgin or Nasa
andrew checkley
By Jimbo #
Posted Tuesday 29th January 2008 12:07 GMT

"Well things will surely move on quicker once space has a commercial purpose, lets face it once any thing is commercialised it goes bonkers and more insane investment will happen...
25 years later we will be on Mars! Just who gets the first Virgin or Nasa"
Hmmm prehaps i should start looking for Wife 2.0 to fund my trip to mars!
Ebay could make this process so much easier for me if they stopped removing my listings!