More fron the self serving hate fron the Down with America crowd at the ACLU. What tripe! Pass the Kool-Aid.

Most of that was a bit tough for me to follow, but from what I've read about the state secrets issue it is a bit of a mess. Just because the state abused the privilege of declaring something a state secret doesn't mean that the logic behind the ability to declare hands off on a state secret is wrong. At the same time we can't ignore that the courts based their decisions on the abuse of such ability. It is just mind boggling to just let things go with that.

IMO the courts are being way too lenient on the other branches. I wish they would take the credibility of the source of the declaration of such supposed secrets into consideration.

That would be the same peace-loving El-Masri that spat in a female shop assistants face and then burnt down the store because he claimed they sold him a dodgy iPod? The one suspected of beating up a truck driving instructor? Didn't he admit to being a member of a Druze militant group? Yeah, he sounds such a nice guy, I'd take everything he said at face value too......

So he got mistaken for Al-Masri and got a free holiday to Afghanistan, he doesn't seem to have any physical evidence to backup his claims of vicious beatings and rape. Dare I suggest him and his lawyer are exaggerating in the hope of a nice, big windfall from suing Boeing?

The current politcial establishment will all be dead in 50 years time, but Boeing will still be around. Perhaps if any of those kidnapped by the US government are still alive they can take Boeing to court then... unless there is a amazingly unlikely coincidence of accidental file cabinet fires, email record dissapearances and back-up tape losses in the next few decades.

Powerful people are like viruses - always looking for a way to dodge the system's defences so as to exploit the host for their own benifit. Even if this harms the host.

Reynolds sure sounds like certain persons in, or formerly in, the US government can be charged with perjury...

Nothing new there. All the other governments do the same.

The one, singular and only thing that the present occupant of the White House has accomplished has been to so completely polarize the country - and the world - that there won't be any middle ground - or much of a middle class to stand on it - for at least a hundred years. This case (Mohamad vs. Jeppeson) is a perfect example of that, and the boorish, Know-Nothing yobbishness displayed in these comments (yes, I'm talking about *you*, "Chris C") is embarrassing and humiliating to anyone who has ever cared about the United States or especially her Constitution. I would suggest, Chris, that in between your readings of the Weekly Standard, the Wall Street Journal, and The Turner Diaries, that you might wish to make some time to familiarize yourself with the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence - along with other appropriate materials of the time such as the Federalist Papers.

Why do I care? I was born in what once was the United States of America and, in my callow youth, volunteered to serve in the Navy of what was then the USA. In so doing, I swore the same oath that every other sailor, soldier, Marine or airman has sworn since The Beginning Of Time (either about 1830 or the founding of their service) - including, specifically, swearing to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Note the last three words there; Congress understood that not all existential threats were external. In fact, virtually every democracy that has ever fallen (think Rome, Weimar Germany, etc.) did so due to the greed and treachery of some of its citizens necessarily coupled with the apathy and/or ignorance of the vast majority. Unfortunately, what once was the United States of America appears clearly, at this juncture, to have gone down the same sorrowful path.

And as far as your criticism of the ACLU or civil-rights groups in general is concerned, Chris, I would strongly encourage you to familiarize yourself with a certain poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller. I'm sure that if you went through the educational system in Western Europe, or even what's left of the system in America, you'd have heard of it. "First the came for..."

In my comment, I questioned El-Masri's credibility given that he has a widely-known history of violent criminal behavior. Would you like me to use shorter words for you, it seems three syllables is a bit of a challenge to your comprehension?

Yes, I do think the US and German Governments, the CIA and the BND have jointly handled the whole affair extremely badly and they should apologise and pay some form of compensation. He couldn't get a payout from the CIA (big surprise) so now he wants to go after the pilots and owners of the plane that flew him out of Croatia to Baghdad and possibly on to Afghanistan. You seem to hope they will be punished for doing that job, despite them being in no position to either question the validity of any CIA claims against El-Masri or his own protestations. El-Masri's team have made sure that the crew's names have been publicly aired and smeared in the German press as a tactic to try and force Boeing and the CIA to settle. I assume you didn't know that either, but then I'm not surprised. Would you like to post a "worthless" rebuttal of either El-Masri's criminal behavior or his tactics in the Boeing case?

Whilst I agree El-Masri should get some compensation and an apology from the US and German governments, I don't agree with the idea of labelling the Jeppesen Dataplan Inc employees and their employer criminals and torturers. Despite your obvious belief that El-Masri must be whiter-than-white (or maybe that is that the CIA must be blacker-than-black?) I find it very hard to believe some of his stories, especially as he has admitted discussing with other prisoners what they should say on their release. His behaviour since has not helped his case.

And to try and smear the Jeppesen employees by inferring they knew what was going to happen to El-Masri or any of their other passengers is dishonest. He was held by the CIA, not Jeppesen or its employees. If he was tortured, it was by the CIA, not Jeppesen employees. It was the US government and the German government that colluded over the cover-up, not Jeppesen. But it is Jeppesen that has had its name published, leaving them open to personal attack and slander. El-Masri's lawyer is too smart to try releasing CIA or BND agents' real names, seeing as they have state protection and plenty of scope for legal response, whereas the Jepessen's are limited.

The obvious aim of the people pushing this is to stop the rendition process and restrict CIA activity by making companies that work with the CIA fearful of both public slander and their own employees' safety - El-Masri is just as much a pawn in their game as he was to the CIA when he was kidnapped.

Name-calling, burning evidence, and bald-faced lying won't do the job.

America would need to either prosecute its own war criminals to regain its honor, or have the International War Crimes Tribuneral do it for them.

That will mean US politicians impeaching US politicians, US civil servants and judges indicting and convicting their peers, and US military officers court marshaling and convicting their peers.

Will a sufficient majority of US voters decide to force their governments to do this?

My bet is that the majority of American voters are so disconnected from world opinion and generally accepted concepts of right and wrong that they will choose to live with their national dishonor in perpetuity. These people voted GWB in for his second term after he claimed they shared his moral values. These are the people who have continued to fail to bring their My Lai Massacre war criminals to trial.

And I seriously doubt that the minority of US voters who do know right from wrong will be able to educate enough of their fellow countrymen sufficiently to shift their country back to the path of courage and honor.

I hope I'm wrong. I truly hope they take the necessary steps to restore their country's honor.

If you, as a citizen, have and continue to vote to support a government that conducts torture, war crimes and/or crimes against humanity, are you not a more serious violent criminal than some mere individual spitting in the face of a store clerk?

Keith T - if you want to label me that way, sure! I have no problem with your labels if it makes you feel better, in fact I'll even vote for the government that uses those same "dirty tactics" (what, are we playing croquet here!?!?) to defend your right to label me. Of course, that means I also get the right to say that in my opinion you're an intellectually-deficient hippy with limited ability to form an opinion truly his own, whether it's true or not. Do you often find yourself frowning and saying "if only we could all get along?"

Infernoz - actually, the limited torture that has been applied to Al Quaeda operatives (I suppose you want to call them "freedom fighters"?) has been very successful because the techniques instill not a fear of injury but of death. Abu Zubaydah coughed up half the AQ network after less than a minute of waterboarding. That's the guy that did the planning for 9/11, which means he killed 3000+ people. Guys like him already hate us (I say "us" loosely as I assume you think your moral superiority automatically makes you immune to their wrath), so I don't think we're going to lose much by making his buddies hate us a bit more, duh! The CIA has access to years of research into LSD, morphine, temazepam, scopolamine derivatives, etc, etc, and with all those high-tech biochemicals on offer they still rate good old fashioned scare-the-sh*t-outa-them torture as more effective. But then maybe I shouldn't tell you any more, maybe you should just back away from the PC and go hide in the corner with your tinfoil hat on (don't you know the CIA can read your mind through the screen!!!).

I spent 23 years in the US Army, the last 11 of them in the Mech Infantry, where I was a Bradley commander. I commanded the guard detail at a nuclear weapons facility (with enough live warheads to sterilize any major city in the world down to the bedrock) in Germany. I had my kneecap smashed while on active duty in service to my country. I draw a Disabled Veteran's pension. I am certainly anything but anti-American.

But the Administration of George W. Bush is the most loathsome, fascist, un-American organization I have ever witnessed in my 57-plus years of life, and I heartily wish to see Bush, Cheney, and their cronies tried for their high crimes against the Constitution of the United States of America, because they have done nothing in the interests of the nation, and everything in the interests of their own power, and the profits of their "pet" contractors, such as Halliburton. They have ignored (and mutilated, far beyond violated) the law of the land, grabbed powers which are legally denied to them, abused American citizens without cause other than the opposition of those citizens to the unlawful acts of the Bush Administration, and made American freedom an object of derision everywhere.

They make me regret my decision to serve my country. You make me question the point of defending it, as well, but [...excised...] I am inclined to write that off as the inevitable price of defending the majority of citizens, who are upright, moral, and just as horrified by the rule of Bush's Terror Brigade as I am.

Sorry I missed this first time around.

"These people voted GWB in for his second term after he claimed they shared his moral values."

There is a growing body of evidence that the machines used to tally the votes in the "swing" States were easily tampered with. There is certainly plenty of evidence that Florida, the State which cast the deciding Electoral College votes during Bush's first campaign, was suborned:

1. Bush's campaign manager in Florida was also the Secretary of State, who was legally bound to declare the vote legal or illegal, based on her own investigation of any charges that it may be suspect. She declared it legal.

2. The same Florida Secretary of State was the only person who could have open ballot boxes and resealed them with apparently untampered seals.

3. At least 14 ballot boxes went "missing" for several hours between the polling stations and the vote-counting location.

4. The districts in which ballot boxes "went missing" also tallied an overwhelming majority of votes for Bush.

Do the math. Personally, I am convinced that Bush was never elected the *first* time, and therefor could not legally run for a second term.