How long have the Supremes been involved in corporate law?

A button, on a website, that lets you buy a product for a set price. Of course well let you patent that Mr Troll, I don't know where you get all these crazy ideas from.

From the article: "The case relates to eBay's "Buy It Now" function."

From the AP report: "The dispute revolves around eBay's "Buy It Now" option".

From the AP report: "...prevented eBay from continuing to use the "Buy It Now" feature."

From the AP report: "... licensing fees for use of its patented technology...."

As usual in 'IT' patent cases, it seems difficult to figure out what exactly has been patented and in what way the complainant feels that all their hard work and investment has been infringed by the defendant.

I fail to see how a 'feature' or 'option' can be patented in any case (rather than any specially developed technology required to implement or present them). A 'function' might be worthy of protection but it depends on how you define it etc.

I'm not familiar with the history of auctions but I'm sure that someone somewhere at sometime has publicly stated - "tell you what, you can have it for 3 florins right now if you like", hence prior art.

Given that e-Bay have so vigorously defended the case, it seems to be something more fundamental than having to rewrite a block of 'accidentally copied' code or detailed functional implementation.

Could this be another 'One Click' or does anyone know more details of the case?

Danny - Showing your age there mate ;)

And yeah, patent'ing something thats been around for decades is stupid.

I'm afraid I have to disagree with your comments Mr Coward... they have taken the chocolate vending machines off of the tube.

...because of patent infringement?....

Because they too theived your hard earned cash, quite often for nothing in return!

"Patented technology" is a bit of an over engineered statement, innit?

Next time you go to the loo, beware, Disney has a copyright on Pooh !!!

Flush before they can pull a court case.