Function, Option, Feature, Technology -- which is it?
From the article: "The case relates to eBay's "Buy It Now" function."
From the AP report: "The dispute revolves around eBay's "Buy It Now" option".
From the AP report: "...prevented eBay from continuing to use the "Buy It Now" feature."
From the AP report: "... licensing fees for use of its patented technology...."
As usual in 'IT' patent cases, it seems difficult to figure out what exactly has been patented and in what way the complainant feels that all their hard work and investment has been infringed by the defendant.
I fail to see how a 'feature' or 'option' can be patented in any case (rather than any specially developed technology required to implement or present them). A 'function' might be worthy of protection but it depends on how you define it etc.
I'm not familiar with the history of auctions but I'm sure that someone somewhere at sometime has publicly stated - "tell you what, you can have it for 3 florins right now if you like", hence prior art.
Given that e-Bay have so vigorously defended the case, it seems to be something more fundamental than having to rewrite a block of 'accidentally copied' code or detailed functional implementation.
Could this be another 'One Click' or does anyone know more details of the case?