The new UK defence purchasing minister has announced the production of a Defence Technology Plan, intended to lay out the kind of new military tech the UK armed forces would like to see developed. Baroness Taylor, Minister for Defence Equipment and Support has just replaced the outgoing Lord Drayson, who quit in the run-up to a …
Apparently the new Minister For Wednesday Afternoons Between 16:22PM and 16:51PM During Periods of Good Weather is playing Middle Manager Babble Bingo.
She's only missing Paradigm and Synergy now
Years of constructive, lean government to look forward to in that department then ?
Zap guns and light sabres at twenty paces.
Reinventing the past
the research plan is on the basis of upgrading existing equipment?
Where is the plan that says "we'll go after totally new ideas and fund them well"? There's a real risk we do another Eurofighter - tarting up an old design with new bells and whistles. We need the research to create a break with the past and leave the go faster stripe upgrades to slow old BAE.
Yes, all very well, but ...
... will we be getting sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads? Enquiring taxpayers wish to know.
'transparent prioritisation and coherence'
I hear the whale song calling...
...but she loses marks for failing to mention 'sustainability' or indeed 'public/private partnership end-to-end conflict resolution scenarios'.
Very disappointing, and from a New Labour minister at that.
Prepare for Alien Mail, M'Lady. Brain in Gear, Think, Sign off on the dotted Line. Simple.
"Where is the plan that says "we'll go after totally new ideas and fund them well"?"
That the third party proposes, spells out and outlines funding management, for the new Minister to say ...We've got a new plan which we'd rather keep under wraps for now although all the best plans will be the ones under wraps that you might never get to hear about ....except all the glory pieces/flag waving stuff.
And everyone knows that as soon as you start sharing anything over the net, any spooky Tom, Dick, Vladamir, Ming or Hajime deserves his share.
Sometimes low tech is fine
"There's a real risk we do another Eurofighter - tarting up an old design with new bells and whistles. "
If only the Eurofighter was just a tarted-up old design. The French Rafale was based on existing technology and hence was relatively cheap and put into production in a few years. In contrast, Eurofighter is technologically very ambitious, and as a result, twenty years have passed since its prototype first flew (the "EAP": I forget what that was an acronym for). During this time, the enemy has changed, and technology has moved on anyway, and this multi-billion pound project has drained resources from more sensible procurement programmes. Being a four-nation procurement programme didn't help. Meanwhile, the RAF has lacked a credible fighter since at least the 1970s.
Pushing barriers in defence technology is very expensive and can just trigger an arms race with your enemy. We should only do so where there is a credible threat and a shortcoming in our capability. In the Eurofighter case, a bread-and-butter fighter would have met our needs.
- Vid Antarctic ice THICKER than first feared – penguin-bot boffins
- Hi-torque tank engines: EXTREME car hacking with The Register
- Review What's MISSING on Amazon Fire Phone... and why it WON'T set the world alight
- Product round-up Trousers down for six of the best affordable Androids
- Antique Code Show World of Warcraft then and now: From Orcs and Humans to Warlords of Draenor