strong demand #
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
That should see strong demand from the legal profession.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
So if I can discover the "next" element and name it and then make nano tubes I can have a VULVA! I'll be in the lab...
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
Given the presence of CuNTs, shouldn't this be labled appropriately to protect people from the evil, humourless office-web-filter?
I choose Paris cos she is a ...
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
Especially the supplementary information talking about Open and Closed CuNTs. Oh dear...
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
If heterojunctions are on there, is a homojunction Kings Cross?
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
Now I can say to my soon to be old boss that I always considered them a copper nanotube.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
Do you use Beryllium nanotubes to go around corners?
Camping with Tellurium nanotubes?
Does an abundance of radium nanotubes cause some people to go off on one in forums?
Just make sure you don't make any from calcium...
All this is in a bid to be allowed to don my coat and leave the premises.
Mind you, keep at it long enough and my employers may just make my wish come true. Premenantly.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 11:58 GMT
That should see strong demand from the legal profession.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 12:13 GMT
I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only person who feels that they work with BiNT's on a regular basis
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 12:13 GMT
... and the number of times the C acronym is used in the text is quite large. And it's Royal Soc Chemistry journal, paper marked as "Received (in Cambridge, UK)" ... it is implausible that noone would have noticed this. But then, I suppose, it is the obvious acronym, generated in the same way as exisiting ones .... anything else would have looked odd, in a sense.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 14:24 GMT
This is not original work. The Hugh Heffner Institute has already published several articles showing advanced copper nanotubes that are are also PlutoniumBeryllium-free.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 14:26 GMT
in Australia was called Curtin University of Technology (CUT). Rumour always was that it was originally intended to be called Curtin University of New Technology but for some reason the New was dropped.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 16:26 GMT
Newcastle Poly was going to call itself the City University of Newcastle upon Tyne...
Bible-bashing students at Cambridge once set up a Cambridge University New Testament Society...
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 16:26 GMT
I wonder if any chinese boffins are working on quadruple in-line memory modules.. i've been waiting years.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 16:26 GMT
I suppose a calling someone a copper nanotube sounds better than callling them a James Blunt... I think it sounds Pete Tong!
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 17:05 GMT
To be heard chanted on the terraces the length and breadth of the country on Saturday afternoon:
"All coppers are nanotubes. All coppers are nanotubes."
(Sadly, I cannot imagine Reg reader chanting it, nor one copper understanding it!)
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 18:44 GMT
Rumour has it that Border TV was originally called Scottish Highlands and Islands Television until someone was doodling in a board meeting...
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 20:21 GMT
A significant portion of the human population have had these for centuries. About 0.7 billion have them right now! And that is only the Chinese version! ;-P
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 23:11 GMT
...feel a bit sorry for Ruthenium Nanotubes. They seem so much smaller and weedier than all the others.
Sorry, sorry, I know. That joke was a bit Protactinium Nanotubes.
OK. Got coat. Or should that be Cobalt-Astatine?
Yes, yes, I'm going.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 23:11 GMT
Is sometimes called the South Halifax Institute of Technology.
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 23:34 GMT
you very well might need one of these:
Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscope - (anacronym left to the reader)
The original Paper - (of the same name)
Journal of Chemical Physics, 1972 Val 56, Number 4, page 1776
Posted Saturday 10th November 2007 01:05 GMT
cunning stunt ! have those sinoscientists managed to pull off, so amazing .
Posted Saturday 10th November 2007 17:48 GMT
You can't have forgotten about the Sheffield Hallam Institute of Technology??
Posted Sunday 11th November 2007 03:58 GMT
Doesn't need an acronym like that. It is synonymous with the word. The acronym would be redundant.
Posted Sunday 11th November 2007 11:13 GMT
is my favoured way of expressing my opinion to the retreating back of an irritant.
Posted Sunday 11th November 2007 16:58 GMT
I wonder if these tubes went into this radio product (NSFW)
http://www.qx100.com/cp/show_175.html
Posted Monday 12th November 2007 04:55 GMT
...please! I'll wager that the title of The Register's award and the attention devoted to a copper-based expletive/body part pun are both silly and offensive to lots of readers.
When The Register pulls its punches, it recalls Punch (of blessed memory). When it doesn't, it smacks of losers like Beavis and Butthead sniggering "He said ... heh-heh heh-heh heh-heh".
Please note that B&B were themselves the real object of satire, much in the tradition of German Lausbuben (rascals) like Max and Moritz, and Struwelpeter.
Why would The Register voluntarily turn itself into a similar object of derision?