Violation of policy, AKA... #
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:31 GMT
...he probably shagged the wrong person.
The IT Angle on that would be horizontal, of course.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 03:56 GMT
Perhaps he refused to use Vista?
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 04:22 GMT
...wouldn't have to do with the Computerworld article in which he defends the use of SAP and Siebel CRM in-house at MS, now, would it?!?
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 14:02 GMT
Either that, or a Google search, or checking his Yahoo email, or...
(Amused cough)
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:31 GMT
...he probably shagged the wrong person.
The IT Angle on that would be horizontal, of course.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
It is well known that Microsoft doesn't eat its own dog food. They used to produce all their own internal software for their day to day running, but found that it was cheaper and easier to buy software for these tasks (what does that tell you about their products?).
You seriously think for one minute that they store the Windows source code in SourceSafe? of course not, Perforce is the tool of choice here.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
Wasn't there an MS policy on retention of email? Something like it had to be deleted within 3 days (maybe a teensy bit more but not much). Presumably they can't afford the storage space, 'cos it couldn't possibly be because they got scared that the next round of toothless anti-trust investigators might actually find undeniable evidence of a smoking gun sometime, right?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/11/ms_legal_mail_autodestruct/
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
"Perhaps he refused to use Vista?"
I was going to say he was caught smuggling a MacBook in to use as an office machine... ;-)
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
He should have kept those 'Linux inside' stickers at home..
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
More likely he did use Vista. Surely no serious company permits its staff to use it.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
You mean he installed Linux on a work PC?
<Waits to see how many other people said the same thing>
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
Due to restructuring and not violation of policy, I find myself unexpectedly conveniently available. Of course I would have to commute from South Dorset - using public transport.
Come to think of it that may go against me.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
I hear that MS employees have been told that anyone running Windows on a Mac will be disciplined... maybe that was the problem...
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
Bill : We MUST sell more Vista even though no one like to use it, its slow, buggy and most difficult to use
CIO : I disagree, if Vista is crap, we should extend XP for another 10 years and keep updating it until Vista is ready
Bill : You are fired !!!!
ps, I installed Office 2007 on a new workstation yesterday, and boy, it took me a while just to find where the PRINT icon or File/Print is, is this progress ? the bars were full of colorful icons, but all I really wanted is the print option.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
Maybe he was caught actually SAYING that he didn't use Vista.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
He just lost interest in the baby-eating and puppy-stomping. That, or he ran out of bullshit and inadvertently released actual information - not the role of a CIO!
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:41 GMT
smilie included to make comment poster happy ;-)
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:43 GMT
I heard from a reliable source that they found a linux box in his house.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 18:46 GMT
no no no, he was caught checking his gmail while he had his laptop booted of a ubuntu live cd
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 21:32 GMT
Actually, there's a lot of Linux that is supported at Microsoft. Yes, believe it or not, Linux is an actual test platform for some of the products.
What did he do? If Microsoft isn't saying and he isn't saying, there's no way to know. Anyways, it wasn't for open source or using a Mac or anything like that.
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 21:32 GMT
... he released a software product that didn't have bugs, was fast and efficient instead of bloated and slow, and actually worked really quite well.
Inconceivable!
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 22:49 GMT
group policy of course!
/hat/coat/scarf/gloves