"DNS is fairly robust" #
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 01:15 GMT
...will go down in history as famous last words, in the same vein as "What's the worst that could happen?"
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 21:52 GMT
Who is the poor bugger who will get 198.32.64.12 set up as his new gateway or server address...
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 01:15 GMT
...will go down in history as famous last words, in the same vein as "What's the worst that could happen?"
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 03:56 GMT
or indeed, as many will know: "How hard can it be?"
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 17:13 GMT
ICANN would probably like to move DNS away from the US.
Posted Thursday 8th November 2007 18:46 GMT
> ICANN would probably like to move DNS away from the US.
Uhh, several of the root servers already anycast from outside the US, in fact from many places all over the globe:
http://www.root-servers.org/
To date, F, I, J, K, and M all have nodes outside North America and thus outside the US. It makes sense - why confine yourself to a single location far away from many of your consumers?
Posted Friday 9th November 2007 07:51 GMT
this is (or should be) a non-event.
When BIND starts up, it doesn't use it's root hints file as-is, it uses them a list of server that it can then contact to get an up to date list. So it only needs one of them to be contactable for it to get an up to date list - after that it's business as usual.
I would hope that all implementations would do the same, but then you never know what clever implementation ideas someone might have come up with !
Sign up, sign up for The Register's weekly mobile & wireless newsletter - click here