The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Googlewhack trick used to slip junk mail past spam filters

Advanced features in Google's search engine are being used by spammers to disguise the URLs of spamvertised sites. Hackers have been using Google search functions to hunt for vulnerabilities. Now their peers in the junk mail business are getting into the act, Symantec reports. Google supports a variety of advanced query words …

This topic is closed for new posts.
Paris Hilton

Well this is awfully WWI...

Looks like the trench wars of spam are still going.

Coat

Slow, Slow Symantec

These 'search result' URLs have been appearing for at least 6 months, and have been blocked - at least by gmail - for much of that time.

Where have Symantec been?

Flame

Brightmail?

Brightmail couldn't spot a spammy mail if it slapped them in the face. $60-million world wide sales in a pretty lucrative market space is a piss poor effort. Develop new technology indeed. Pfft.

As for the junk mailing scum who infest the ether, I wish it was legal to shoot the bastards. Open season on the ROCSO list.

Anonymous Coward
Unhappy

I guess that's the end of tinyurl then.

I guess that's the end of tinyurl then.

Anonymous Coward
Alien

Reverse Engineering ???

If you look at the Symantec link, they mention they did some reverse engineering. What was the reverse engineering which their scientists did you wonder?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inurl:replica%20intext:%22Perfect+cheap+replica+watches+online.%22&btnI=

Take out the "%22&btnI=" at the end of the url

Brilliant !!!

Unhappy

Title

Is this why my earlier search for "aubergine" got this?

"We're sorry...

... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now. "

http://www.google.co.uk/sorry/?continue=http://www.google.co.uk/search%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Daubergine%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3D

(BTW: How about giving us the option of an icon that looks like someone banging their head on the desk? )

@Trinity

Are you using a web proxy at all? I've encountered the same error when searching google through a proxy.

Go

Re: I guess that's the end of tinyurl then.

Here's an alternative that avoids the disguising feature of tinyurl AND also eliminates accidental clicks on links while avoiding having to memorize and retype complicated URLs - telldodo. (for example, tell dodo: kentucky button suspense)

The nice thing about my spam filter

is that it evolves a lot faster than Symantec (anyone surprised ? thought not).

Any sender that is not on my whitelist get his mail sent to the spam bin. In the spam bin, any string that corresponds to anything I have previously flagged gets the mail deleted permanently.

End of story.

I haven't seen any of these reselling jokes since I flagged it five months ago. Besides, I don't click on links sent to me by people I don't know.

Jobs Halo

preview feature in tinyurl

"The following URL:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/10/dwarf_stars/

has a length of 52 characters and resulted in the following TinyURL which has a length of 25 characters:

http://tinyurl.com/2cf8pr

Or, give your recipients confidence with a preview TinyURL:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cf8pr"

OK for tinyurl among friends; no guarantee, of course, for links from strangers.

Remember: don't take sweeties from strange men

This topic is closed for new posts.