@Trinity #
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 17:10 GMT
Are you using a web proxy at all? I've encountered the same error when searching google through a proxy.
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 10:32 GMT
Looks like the trench wars of spam are still going.
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 10:32 GMT
These 'search result' URLs have been appearing for at least 6 months, and have been blocked - at least by gmail - for much of that time.
Where have Symantec been?
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 10:32 GMT
Brightmail couldn't spot a spammy mail if it slapped them in the face. $60-million world wide sales in a pretty lucrative market space is a piss poor effort. Develop new technology indeed. Pfft.
As for the junk mailing scum who infest the ether, I wish it was legal to shoot the bastards. Open season on the ROCSO list.
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 10:32 GMT
I guess that's the end of tinyurl then.
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 12:43 GMT
If you look at the Symantec link, they mention they did some reverse engineering. What was the reverse engineering which their scientists did you wonder?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inurl:replica%20intext:%22Perfect+cheap+replica+watches+online.%22&btnI=
Take out the "%22&btnI=" at the end of the url
Brilliant !!!
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 14:46 GMT
Is this why my earlier search for "aubergine" got this?
"We're sorry...
... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now. "
http://www.google.co.uk/sorry/?continue=http://www.google.co.uk/search%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Daubergine%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3D
(BTW: How about giving us the option of an icon that looks like someone banging their head on the desk? )
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 17:10 GMT
Are you using a web proxy at all? I've encountered the same error when searching google through a proxy.
Posted Tuesday 6th November 2007 19:01 GMT
Here's an alternative that avoids the disguising feature of tinyurl AND also eliminates accidental clicks on links while avoiding having to memorize and retype complicated URLs - telldodo. (for example, tell dodo: kentucky button suspense)
Posted Wednesday 7th November 2007 10:04 GMT
is that it evolves a lot faster than Symantec (anyone surprised ? thought not).
Any sender that is not on my whitelist get his mail sent to the spam bin. In the spam bin, any string that corresponds to anything I have previously flagged gets the mail deleted permanently.
End of story.
I haven't seen any of these reselling jokes since I flagged it five months ago. Besides, I don't click on links sent to me by people I don't know.
Posted Saturday 10th November 2007 14:14 GMT
"The following URL:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/10/dwarf_stars/
has a length of 52 characters and resulted in the following TinyURL which has a length of 25 characters:
http://tinyurl.com/2cf8pr
Or, give your recipients confidence with a preview TinyURL:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2cf8pr"
OK for tinyurl among friends; no guarantee, of course, for links from strangers.
Remember: don't take sweeties from strange men
Sign up, sign up for The Register's weekly IT security newsletter - click here