Boffins dig up oldest living animal.... #
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
....and then kill it.
I can't help but think that ther is some subtle nuance of irony hidden in there
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
....and then kill it.
I can't help but think that ther is some subtle nuance of irony hidden in there
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
The oldest animal humans have killed - what an achievement.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
Boffins dig up oldest living animal and kill it
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
Or is it because it is a clam? Is there video?
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
http://www.bangor.ac.uk/news/full.php.en?Id=382
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:39 GMT
Given that I live in Iceland and see this type of shells on the coastline. I am sure that it was already dead when they found it on the coastline. But this type of animals live in the deep ocean, not on the coastline.
But I don't think they know for how long the animal had been dead when they found the shell.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:47 GMT
Really? 405 years old? Is someone pulling our collective lower appendages here?
"Help the Aged has funded the team investigating the clam to the tune of £40,000."?
If this is indeed all true, does this not prove the fact that science is THAT fantastic!? We find a creature older than anything else living and we manage to kill the poor bloody thing? Way to go Mankind!
Surely it didn't NEED to die? Could it not have been kept in an environment akin to that from which it came? And I'm hoping it didn't HAVE to be killed to get it's age? Not like cutting a tree down to see how old it is by counting the rings?
"Oooo.... this tree was 735 years old before we mercilessly cut it down to see how old it is!"
</rant><coat><door>
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 11:48 GMT
They did say that "since it was discovered", it has died, which kind of implies that it was alive when they found it.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 12:04 GMT
> Could it not have been kept in an environment akin to that from which it came?
Cold, dark and under massive pressure? No, I don't think so. I'm guessing that the clam was alive when it was dredged up but couldn't/didn't survive the trip to the surface. The Bangor report doesn't give a Cause of Death, or mention what 400-year old clam tastes like.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 12:39 GMT
"The Bangor scientists...believe that the clams may have evolved exceptionally effective defences which hold back the destructive ageing processes that normally occur."
Or it could just be that living in a cold dark environment while doing very little helps you live longer. Can't be very stressful being a clam, waiting for food to drift into your mouth.
If you want to see the ageing process at work call your IT bods with an unexplained, critical, company-wide problem that hits first thing Monday morning. I might make a suggestion that our DBAs should be stored in the fridge to improve their longevity.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 12:39 GMT
The secret to a long life is to live deep in the ocean isn't very helpful.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 12:39 GMT
I wonder if they comforted the dying clam with prozac, which - as any fule kno - has been scientifically proven to make them happy, or at least randy.
I choose Paris Hilton as my avatar, because I am sure she is used to having squidgy, moist things in her mouth.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 12:40 GMT
... the story was going to be about Joan Rivers. But then I remembered she had been molested by science (if you can call Plastic surgery a science). I wonder if they'll be saying similar things about Paris when they defrost her in a couple of hundred years.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 13:06 GMT
... BUT THEY MUST BE STOPPED!!!!!! ;)
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 14:02 GMT
And who is addressing the need for robots to assist elderly clams in socialising, feeding, sitting on the ocean floor, etc.?
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 14:33 GMT
... I hate all f**king humans.
"Look! Something slightly out the ordinary, something new, something amazing and curious..... kill it and cut it up!"
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 14:33 GMT
Being a mollusc it already had one foot........(in the grave)
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 14:33 GMT
Look so good, you will not.
I'll get my lightsabre...
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 14:40 GMT
I am more interested in knowing if the animal indeed clamored for life... after all not much goes on down there in the depths now, does it?..
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 15:03 GMT
"Most of what we know about the ocean quahog is what it tastes like"
I think I know why it's dead...
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 15:07 GMT
if you want to live till 405 hide then simply stay away from scientists. simple as that. if a scientist sees you you will die ... we should outlaw all scientists as they are the leading cause of deaths... after all they also invented cars and cancer right ?
coat ,tin foil hat , door ...
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 15:51 GMT
Wow, a person that old would usually be represented in film by someone with a long white beard... So what I was wondering is: Was it a bearded clam?
Already out the door... Seeya.
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 17:06 GMT
It was confronted in the cold light of day by boffins and their fanboiz* and after 405 years of contented existence lost the will to live. Thanks a million. Now you know how alien abductees must feel.
* non-gender specific
Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 01:25 GMT
Boffins beware!
BTW: were these vertical or horizontal???
Posted Tuesday 30th October 2007 19:45 GMT
What is it with scientists? They just can't leave things alone. This poor mollusc is just the latest victim. For decades they have been raving about the pico-seconds after the Big Bang. I'd be more interested in the 30 seconds before it, and I'll bet there was a scientist there saying “They said I'd blow up the world with my black hole generator, but I'll prove them all wrong. WRONG I TELL YOU. Now hit that butto.........”