Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:26 GMT
I dare suggest we might need a French icon? I'd vote either for the French flag or a clove of garlic.
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:26 GMT
So this is a report which ranks countries on the basis of:
a) How much taxpayers money they spend on subsidising industry
and
b) How much a goverment /talks/ about doing the socially responsible 'right thing', rather than how much it actually /does/ it
and then someone is surprised that France tops the table? Sacré Bleu!
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:26 GMT
France is poorly understood by anybody with an anglo saxon background. They do things their way and it works about as well as any other way. With regards to technology in general, without France there would be no European space industry, no Airbus and no Eurostar.
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:26 GMT
As hard as this is to write (being British and American ;-) ), I am with the French on this - IMHO long lunches and shops built with bricks are preferable to mouldy sandwiches from a machine and shopping at Amazon. To be sure, I do some shopping on-line and some lunching alone, but I prefer activities with more social interaction. Call me a Luddite if you will (I don't have a TV and don't miss it), but I value quality of life over price of goods...
If the virtualization of social life continues in the same direction, the pub will be among the next casualties. And that will give even Reg hacks something to regret :-)
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:26 GMT
It's bad enough that this article starts by misleading you into thinking the French have come out top in an IT efficiency audit but unfortunately it subsequently fails to correct that clearly so you have to finish up reading it twice. Even then I don't really understand what it's saying. In fact it's more a bit of french-style philosophizing. What actually was the ranking about and how does that affect us?
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:37 GMT
France is good at this.. development "aid" with strings attached in that the money can only be spent on "French" products.
The "customer" officials get money under the table, businesses get deals, and the French government gets to look good. I've heard that sometimes the systems don't even get installed.
Good for the developing world, not.
Anonymous coward who got sucked into the mess created by one of these deals.
(the long lunches are not a joke... on the first day of commissioning the salesmen and customers went off for a 2.5 hour lunch!)
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:37 GMT
The French have long had smartcard cash, so they can't be /that/ backward.
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 09:57 GMT
@Robin
"They do things their way and it works about as well as any other way"
That certainly is not true of the plumbing. They do it there way, the radiators emit noise rather than heat, and the drains stink of la merde.
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 10:09 GMT
Because American "aid" (for example) is different? At least when the French gov gives money (not a lot, I know) to fight HIV in Africa they don't demand "abstinence only" schemes.
Posted Friday 26th October 2007 10:09 GMT
All west/north countries do aid this way, the US is the most explicit about their aid being of benefit to the US. Give them tractors and then sell them a lucrative support contract sort of thing.
Interesting article. It is interesting to see a different take on the endless march of technology.
What views do people have on call centres in India?
Posted Monday 29th October 2007 10:03 GMT
@James Anderson
The whole of Paris stinks of la merde, that's why so many perfume companies are french I believe....
Back to the article
