Agreed, if the providers are crap who cares?
I'm presently in an 8Mb contract with Toucan where I'm getting 3.5Mbps tops and am in a dispute with a provider that has some of the most appalling customer service and tech support I've ever seen.
Sadly many of their competitors are either other brands of Tiscali or Fast4 or have massive lock-in. Once I'm free of Toucan I'll have another look around. I'm told Be is quite good; even BT would be appealing, but an 18-month lock-in isn't.
Competition only means anything if consumer rights are protected and many of the contracts are written such that once you agree and get past the cooling off period you can have completely crap service, but as long as it meets the definition of broadband (I think that's still 512Kbps here) you're pretty well stuffed as there's no requirement to provide the maximum speed or anything very close to it. Either we need regulated minimum connect speeds or we need better rights to terminate contracts with providers.


