Lunacy proceedings #
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 08:47 GMT
Excellent! LMFAO!
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 08:47 GMT
I love it when you stick it to Jack Thompson. Go to town on his ass.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 09:52 GMT
...John farking Thompson...
[Coat on] TAXI..!!
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 09:52 GMT
I'm sure this article is making a point. Maybe even a valid one. But shoe-horning 'jokes' into every other sentence makes it hard to read. F'k me - it reads like a blog posting.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 09:52 GMT
...and maybe reassuring, but nobody here should forget that *this does not matter*. The mainstream press will NOT report it, because it makes them look like fools for taking him seriously - and it prevents them from running more breathless stories (never a more appropriate moniker) about how games are making kids into murderers.
Thompson is untouchable unless something so serious it can't be ignored happens, and that's unlikely (even if he were jailed the mainstream media could easily pretend it didn't happem. And who'd know?). So all of this, while very satisfying, is completely meaningless in the larger context of Thompson's power to encourage censorship of video games.
And that's probably why he's laughing, sweetie.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 09:52 GMT
There were some quality double-entendres in that article. "Hardened activist", "gavel", "a hard time", and mention of grabbing something by the hand. Eventually I started to see a double-entendre in every word, even "the" and "court", and now I find it hard to look at the spaces between the words without thinking of a crevice. Good job.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 10:36 GMT
The press has never been all that good at reporting when they've been suckered.
This could easily wreck his status, and stop future cases. He may well just vanish, not worth the risk of reporting.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 10:38 GMT
I was thinking that too.
As for "the true meaning of hard time" I assume this means he might actually get some first, er, hand experience, in which case he'll be spending eternity in Hell. That's the trouble with hard-line Christianity - no forgiveness...
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 10:42 GMT
I don't like censorship , I think Jack should be allow to post legal images.
It would be a bit ironic for us gamers not to support Jack in his attempts to stop censorship in this case. :)
The irony of jack being a content pirate, who then shares to all, is kind of sweet, too. lol
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 12:36 GMT
Reminds me of the following story: my friend X was being sued for libel by Y. However, Y ran around showing the libel to everyone and shouting "look what X said about me!". The judge threw out the case on the grounds that Y was injuring himself.
Thomson is doing the same, prurient thing: "If you search carefully you can find these terrible pics! Look at this! Aren't you injured?"
I'm also reminded of an uptight person who complained her neighbour was flashing her by walking about naked in his house. A policeman turned up, looked out of her window and said "but you can't even see into his house from this angle",
"You can if you climb on top of this cupboad".
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 12:38 GMT
Yup, agreed - interesting story, badly written.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 14:08 GMT
...that this man is still allowed to practice "law." He is, quite obviously, a lunatic.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 15:12 GMT
I had to do a doubletake halfway though the article to see if it was written by The Lester (hallowed be thy name!). I think we've discovered his secret identity!
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 15:26 GMT
Yep. Jack Thompson is a complete nutter, although when I saw the title of this article I thought it meant he was found in possession of gay pr0n lol. Unfortunately not that funny but still a great read.
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 15:31 GMT
Kent said:
"I’m not the one in trouble. The judge found a certain lawyer’s material obscene. I absolutely love it. This is the best thing to happen to me in a long, long time. Check my [case] filings, sweetie."
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 17:26 GMT
What is with him? Read what Norm Kent from the NationalGayNews.com said about him.... http://nationalgaynews.com/content/view/1742/173/
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 19:55 GMT
he made tham available on the courts systems "to anyone of any age."
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 23:30 GMT
It appeared to me from the judge's PDF that he is simply order this nutjob to explain why the documents were either not filed under seal, with permission of the court, or why links themselves wouldn't suffice instead of spamming the public court with porn. I would imaging the first options to be normal procedure, but no lawyer am I.
At the least he should be disbarred for being a crappy lawyer -- since when is poking the judge in the eye with a stick a good idea when your own livelihood is at stake?
Posted Friday 28th September 2007 23:30 GMT
Once again, irrefutable proof that lawyers are conceived via anal sex!
Posted Saturday 29th September 2007 00:06 GMT
Interesting story, but the randomness made it very hard to tell what parts were jokes by the author and what parts were actually part of the story...
Posted Sunday 30th September 2007 20:04 GMT
If you don't get The Reg's wry sense of humour, you really are in the wrong place.....
And as for double entendres, the best has got to be this story's headline itself!! ROFL