Correct English #
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 12:01 GMT
Excellent use of the word "masses". Well done that journalist.
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 12:01 GMT
Excellent use of the word "masses". Well done that journalist.
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 12:46 GMT
Is what we're seeing today. It's a shame we can't really get closer to the event and relay the images in double...more than that even quick time.
I wonder if it's even there any more?
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 14:09 GMT
An article on pulsars which doesn't mention Jocelyn Bell Burnell?
Huh!
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 14:09 GMT
...only equals 25,000 years ago if the speed of light has remained constant throughout that time - which Einstein doubted.
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 14:09 GMT
...but it was missed opportunity to talk about Roche Lobe Overflow..
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 14:50 GMT
Given the physics of such systems, in particular the strong X-rays and enormous tidal forces, I think 25,000 ly (or about 7,700 pc) is quite close enough!
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 16:40 GMT
The ultimate simulation of a news story. About a simulacrum too! Is this a record?
(Like others, I don't believe in neutron stars whizzing around at the rate of 1 Lucy per second, but in plasma in hydrostatic equilibrium and behaving as a relaxation oscillator).
Posted Tuesday 18th September 2007 19:59 GMT
Where's the Paris Hilton angle?